Division
Sarah Hanson-Young I move: (1) Page 6 (after line 11) , at the end of the Bill, add: Schedule 2 — Modifications of Basin Plan Water Act 2007 1 At the end of Part 2AA Add: 86AK Primacy of environmental considerations in delivering 450 GL of additional environmental water—modifications of Basin Plan 2012 (1) Section 7.09 of the Basin Plan 2012 has effect as if: (a) the words “while maintaining or improving social and economic outcomes” were omitted from paragraph (a) of that section; and (b) the words “economic, social and” were omitted from paragraph (d) of that section; and (c) the words “and benchmark conditions of development” were omitted from paragraph (d) of that section. (2) Subsection 7.17(2) of the Basin Plan 2012 has effect as if paragraph (b) of that subsection (including the heading) were omitted and substituted with the following: Improved environmental outcomes (b) The efficiency contributions to the proposed adjustments achieve improved environmental outcomes compared with the benchmark environmental outcomes. 2 Application (1) The modifications of the Basin Plan 2012 made by subsection 86AK(1) of the Water Act 2007 , as inserted by this Schedule, apply in relation to a supply measure or an efficiency measure, whether the supply measure, or the efficiency measure, was notified under section 7.12 of the Basin Plan 2012 before, on or after the commencement of this item. (2) The modifications of the Basin Plan 2012 made by subsection 86AK(2) of the Water Act 2007 , as inserted by this Schedule, apply in relation to an efficiency contribution that relates to an efficiency measure, whether the efficiency measure was notified under section 7.12 of the Basin Plan 2012 before, on or after the commencement of this item. I circulated the amendment in this chamber and it was referred to a number of times already through the second reading debate. This amendment seeks to ensure that the promised 450 gigalitres that was essential in securing South Australia's suppo
Senate, 2018-06-25. negative: ayes 14, noes 38.
Question
Sarah Hanson-Young I move: (1) Page 6 (after line 11) , at the end of the Bill, add: Schedule 2 — Modifications of Basin Plan Water Act 2007 1 At the end of Part 2AA Add: 86AK Primacy of environmental considerations in delivering 450 GL of additional environmental water—modifications of Basin Plan 2012 (1) Section 7.09 of the Basin Plan 2012 has effect as if: (a) the words “while maintaining or improving social and economic outcomes” were omitted from paragraph (a) of that section; and (b) the words “economic, social and” were omitted from paragraph (d) of that section; and (c) the words “and benchmark conditions of development” were omitted from paragraph (d) of that section. (2) Subsection 7.17(2) of the Basin Plan 2012 has effect as if paragraph (b) of that subsection (including the heading) were omitted and substituted with the following: Improved environmental outcomes (b) The efficiency contributions to the proposed adjustments achieve improved environmental outcomes compared with the benchmark environmental outcomes. 2 Application (1) The modifications of the Basin Plan 2012 made by subsection 86AK(1) of the Water Act 2007 , as inserted by this Schedule, apply in relation to a supply measure or an efficiency measure, whether the supply measure, or the efficiency measure, was notified under section 7.12 of the Basin Plan 2012 before, on or after the commencement of this item. (2) The modifications of the Basin Plan 2012 made by subsection 86AK(2) of the Water Act 2007 , as inserted by this Schedule, apply in relation to an efficiency contribution that relates to an efficiency measure, whether the efficiency measure was notified under section 7.12 of the Basin Plan 2012 before, on or after the commencement of this item. I circulated the amendment in this chamber and it was referred to a number of times already through the second reading debate. This amendment seeks to ensure that the promised 450 gigalitres that was essential in securing South Australia's suppo
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.