Skip to content

Menu

Division

The majority voted against amendment (1) on [sheet 1444](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr6725_amend_d09c076f-875d-4dc6-9af9-582b5914f8ba%22) as moved by Tasmanian Senator [Nick McKim](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/nick_mckim) (Greens), which means it failed. The [amendment](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr6725_amend_d09c076f-875d-4dc6-9af9-582b5914f8ba%22) related to the commencement of the bill, and required that it not commence "*earlier than the day after the day the Minister is given a written report of the review into the NDIS quality and safeguarding framework.*"

Senate, 2021-10-21. negative: ayes 23, noes 27.

Question

The majority voted against amendment (1) on [sheet 1444](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr6725_amend_d09c076f-875d-4dc6-9af9-582b5914f8ba%22) as moved by Tasmanian Senator [Nick McKim](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/nick_mckim) (Greens), which means it failed. The [amendment](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr6725_amend_d09c076f-875d-4dc6-9af9-582b5914f8ba%22) related to the commencement of the bill, and required that it not commence "*earlier than the day after the day the Minister is given a written report of the review into the NDIS quality and safeguarding framework.*"

View original

How each member voted

Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.

Related bills

Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.