Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2020-08-25.36.1) introduced by NSW Senator [Jenny McAllister](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/nsw/jenny_mcallister) (Labor), which means they failed. ### What is the main idea of the bill? According to the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1920a/20bd104): > *The purpose of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Your Superannuation, Your Choice) Bill 2019 (the Bill) is to amend the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (SGAA) to ensure employees under new workplace determinations or enterprise agreements have an opportunity to choose the superannuation fund for their compulsory employer contributions.* ### Amendments text > *(1) Schedule 1, page 3 (before line 5), before the heading specifying Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992, insert:* > >> *Fair Work Act 2009* >> >> *1A At the end of section 187* >> >> *Add:* >> >> *Requirement relating to restrictions of choice of superannuation fund* >> >>> *(7) If the agreement includes a restriction on the choice of superannuation fund or funds available to employees, the FWC must be satisfied that the restriction is in the interests of the employees who will be covered by the agreement.* >>> >>> *(8) For the purposes of considering whether the restriction is in the interests of the employees, the FWC must consider:* >>> >>>> *(a) the extent to which the employers who will be covered by the agreement have complied, or are likely to comply, with the requirements of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992; and* >>>> >>>> *(b) the features of the proposed default superannuation fund or funds, including matters such as insurance; and* >>>> >>>> *(c) any other relevant matters.* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 6, page 4 (lines 3 and 4), omit the item, substitute:* >> >> *6 Paragraph 32C(6 )( h)* >> >> *Repeal the paragraph, substitute:* >> >>> *(h) an enterpri
Senate, 2020-08-25. negative: ayes 22, noes 26.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2020-08-25.36.1) introduced by NSW Senator [Jenny McAllister](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/nsw/jenny_mcallister) (Labor), which means they failed. ### What is the main idea of the bill? According to the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1920a/20bd104): > *The purpose of the Treasury Laws Amendment (Your Superannuation, Your Choice) Bill 2019 (the Bill) is to amend the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (SGAA) to ensure employees under new workplace determinations or enterprise agreements have an opportunity to choose the superannuation fund for their compulsory employer contributions.* ### Amendments text > *(1) Schedule 1, page 3 (before line 5), before the heading specifying Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992, insert:* > >> *Fair Work Act 2009* >> >> *1A At the end of section 187* >> >> *Add:* >> >> *Requirement relating to restrictions of choice of superannuation fund* >> >>> *(7) If the agreement includes a restriction on the choice of superannuation fund or funds available to employees, the FWC must be satisfied that the restriction is in the interests of the employees who will be covered by the agreement.* >>> >>> *(8) For the purposes of considering whether the restriction is in the interests of the employees, the FWC must consider:* >>> >>>> *(a) the extent to which the employers who will be covered by the agreement have complied, or are likely to comply, with the requirements of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992; and* >>>> >>>> *(b) the features of the proposed default superannuation fund or funds, including matters such as insurance; and* >>>> >>>> *(c) any other relevant matters.* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 6, page 4 (lines 3 and 4), omit the item, substitute:* >> >> *6 Paragraph 32C(6 )( h)* >> >> *Repeal the paragraph, substitute:* >> >>> *(h) an enterpri
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.