Division
Alex Gallacher I rise to make a contribution in this debate. I would like to start as I finished off in taking note. This minister ought to talk the plank. He ought to go off the plank—deep six himself—because of these reasons. At the moment, shipbuilding and submarines are approximately 3,000 direct jobs in South Australia. There are no complete figures on indirect jobs, but there are many thousands of them. These are jobs which create things. These are jobs in the economy which create— Mitch Fifield Mr Acting Deputy President, I rise on a point of order. The point of order is relevance. The bill that is before the Senate is the Omnibus Repeal Day (Spring 2014) Bill 2014, and Senator Gallacher is not talking to any of the repeal provisions of the bill. Doug Cameron On the point of order: what the ALP is seeking to do here is to amend the omnibus repeal bill to ensure that there is part of that bill dealing with the submarines. This is exactly on point, and nothing could be more on point in relation to the issue that we are dealing with. Mitch Fifield There have been no amendments to that effect moved. I also point out that this is actually a repeal bill. This is not a bill that is seeking to insert new things into the statute books; this is seeking to take things off the statue books. But, putting that aside, no amendment has been moved. Alex Gallacher This is foreshadowing the amendment to be moved by Senator Conroy in relation to the Omnibus Repeal Day (Spring 2014) Bill 2014: 1 At the end of Division 2 of Part 4 -1A Add: 105BA Future submarine project tender process (1) This section applies if the Commonwealth (including a Minister on behalf of the Commonwealth) proposes to enter into a contract (a _submarine design and building contract_) for the design and building of a submarine, or a substantial part of a submarine, as part of the future submarine project. Note 1: The future submarine project is designated SEA 1000— Zed Seselja Order! I have just taken some
Senate, 2014-12-01. affirmative: ayes 35, noes 29.
Question
Alex Gallacher I rise to make a contribution in this debate. I would like to start as I finished off in taking note. This minister ought to talk the plank. He ought to go off the plank—deep six himself—because of these reasons. At the moment, shipbuilding and submarines are approximately 3,000 direct jobs in South Australia. There are no complete figures on indirect jobs, but there are many thousands of them. These are jobs which create things. These are jobs in the economy which create— Mitch Fifield Mr Acting Deputy President, I rise on a point of order. The point of order is relevance. The bill that is before the Senate is the Omnibus Repeal Day (Spring 2014) Bill 2014, and Senator Gallacher is not talking to any of the repeal provisions of the bill. Doug Cameron On the point of order: what the ALP is seeking to do here is to amend the omnibus repeal bill to ensure that there is part of that bill dealing with the submarines. This is exactly on point, and nothing could be more on point in relation to the issue that we are dealing with. Mitch Fifield There have been no amendments to that effect moved. I also point out that this is actually a repeal bill. This is not a bill that is seeking to insert new things into the statute books; this is seeking to take things off the statue books. But, putting that aside, no amendment has been moved. Alex Gallacher This is foreshadowing the amendment to be moved by Senator Conroy in relation to the Omnibus Repeal Day (Spring 2014) Bill 2014: 1 At the end of Division 2 of Part 4 -1A Add: 105BA Future submarine project tender process (1) This section applies if the Commonwealth (including a Minister on behalf of the Commonwealth) proposes to enter into a contract (a _submarine design and building contract_) for the design and building of a submarine, or a substantial part of a submarine, as part of the future submarine project. Note 1: The future submarine project is designated SEA 1000— Zed Seselja Order! I have just taken some
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.