Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2026-01-20.136.4) introduced by the National Party of Australia, which means they were unsuccessful. There was one rebellion, with Liberal Senator [Alex Antic](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/sa/alex_antic) (SA) voting Yes against the rest of the Liberal Party, who voted No. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 13, page 14 (after line 8), after subparagraph 114A.4(1)(a)(i), insert:* > >> *(ia) has glorified, morally supported or excused terrorism; or* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 13, page 14 (after line 12), after paragraph 114A.4(1)(a), insert:* > >> *(ab) if the AFP Minister has given the organisation a notice under subsection (6) asking the organisation to disavow violence and terrorism—there is no disavowal undertaking (see subsections (6) to (9)) in effect for the organisation; and* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 13, page 15 (after line 14), at the end of section 114A.4, add:* > >> *One-off disavowal undertaking process* >> >> *(6) Before the Governor-General makes a prohibited hate group regulation specifying an organisation, the AFP Minister may give the organisation a written notice asking the organisation to disavow violence and extremism.* >> >> *(7) The organisation may, before the end of 7 days after receiving the notice, give the AFP Minister a written undertaking (a disavowal undertaking) stating that the organisation:* >> >>> *(a) disavows violence and terrorism; and* >>> >>> *(b) will not engage in, prepare or plan to engage in, or assist the engagement in violence or terrorism.* >> >> *(8) For the purposes of paragraph 114A.4(1)(ab), a disavowal undertaking:* >> >>> *(a) takes effect for an organisation when it is received by the AFP Minister; and* >>> >>> *(b) if, at any time after the undertaking is given, the AFP Minister becomes satisfied that it is reasonably necessary for the organisation to be specified by a prohibited hate group regulation to prote
Senate, 2026-01-20. negative: ayes 9, noes 49.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2026-01-20.136.4) introduced by the National Party of Australia, which means they were unsuccessful. There was one rebellion, with Liberal Senator [Alex Antic](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/sa/alex_antic) (SA) voting Yes against the rest of the Liberal Party, who voted No. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 13, page 14 (after line 8), after subparagraph 114A.4(1)(a)(i), insert:* > >> *(ia) has glorified, morally supported or excused terrorism; or* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 13, page 14 (after line 12), after paragraph 114A.4(1)(a), insert:* > >> *(ab) if the AFP Minister has given the organisation a notice under subsection (6) asking the organisation to disavow violence and terrorism—there is no disavowal undertaking (see subsections (6) to (9)) in effect for the organisation; and* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 13, page 15 (after line 14), at the end of section 114A.4, add:* > >> *One-off disavowal undertaking process* >> >> *(6) Before the Governor-General makes a prohibited hate group regulation specifying an organisation, the AFP Minister may give the organisation a written notice asking the organisation to disavow violence and extremism.* >> >> *(7) The organisation may, before the end of 7 days after receiving the notice, give the AFP Minister a written undertaking (a disavowal undertaking) stating that the organisation:* >> >>> *(a) disavows violence and terrorism; and* >>> >>> *(b) will not engage in, prepare or plan to engage in, or assist the engagement in violence or terrorism.* >> >> *(8) For the purposes of paragraph 114A.4(1)(ab), a disavowal undertaking:* >> >>> *(a) takes effect for an organisation when it is received by the AFP Minister; and* >>> >>> *(b) if, at any time after the undertaking is given, the AFP Minister becomes satisfied that it is reasonably necessary for the organisation to be specified by a prohibited hate group regulation to prote
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.