Division
The majority voted against [amendment 3609](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2026-01-20.103.3) introduced by ACT Senator [David Pocock](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/act/david_pocock) (Independent), Tasmanian Senator [Jacqui Lambie](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/jacqui_lambie) (JLN), WA Senator [Fatima Payman](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/wa/fatima_payman) (AV), Victorian Senator [Lidia Thorpe](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/victoria/lidia_thorpe) (Independent) and Tasmanian Senator [Tammy Tyrrell](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/tammy_tyrrell) (Independent). ### Amendment text > *(1) Clause 2, page 2 (table item 1), omit "Sections 1 to 3", substitute "Sections 1 to 4".* > > *(2) Page 2 (after line 19), after clause 3, insert:* > >> *4 Review of operation of Act* >> >> *(1) The Minister must cause an independent review to be conducted of the operation of the amendments made by this Act.* >> >> *(2) Without limiting the matters that may be considered when conducting the review, the review must consider the operation and appropriateness of the mandatory minimum sentences in table items 1AA, 1A and 1B in the table in section 16AAA of the Crimes Act 1914 for offences against the following provisions in the Criminal Code Act 1995:* >> >>> *(a) subsection 80.2BE(1) or (2) (advocating force or violence through causing damage to property);* >>> >>> *(b) subsection 80.2H(1) (public display of prohibited Nazi symbols or giving Nazi salute);* >>> >>> *(c) subsection 80.2HA(1) (public display of prohibited terrorist organisation symbols).* >> >> *Consultation requirement* >> >> *(3) The review must provide for public consultation, including providing for public submissions over a period of at least 2 calendar months.* >> >> *Expert panel conducting the review* >> >> *(4) The review must be conducted by an expert panel comprised of 3 members appointed by the Minister.* >> >> *(5) Th
Senate, 2026-01-20. negative: ayes 29, noes 33.
Question
The majority voted against [amendment 3609](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2026-01-20.103.3) introduced by ACT Senator [David Pocock](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/act/david_pocock) (Independent), Tasmanian Senator [Jacqui Lambie](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/jacqui_lambie) (JLN), WA Senator [Fatima Payman](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/wa/fatima_payman) (AV), Victorian Senator [Lidia Thorpe](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/victoria/lidia_thorpe) (Independent) and Tasmanian Senator [Tammy Tyrrell](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/tammy_tyrrell) (Independent). ### Amendment text > *(1) Clause 2, page 2 (table item 1), omit "Sections 1 to 3", substitute "Sections 1 to 4".* > > *(2) Page 2 (after line 19), after clause 3, insert:* > >> *4 Review of operation of Act* >> >> *(1) The Minister must cause an independent review to be conducted of the operation of the amendments made by this Act.* >> >> *(2) Without limiting the matters that may be considered when conducting the review, the review must consider the operation and appropriateness of the mandatory minimum sentences in table items 1AA, 1A and 1B in the table in section 16AAA of the Crimes Act 1914 for offences against the following provisions in the Criminal Code Act 1995:* >> >>> *(a) subsection 80.2BE(1) or (2) (advocating force or violence through causing damage to property);* >>> >>> *(b) subsection 80.2H(1) (public display of prohibited Nazi symbols or giving Nazi salute);* >>> >>> *(c) subsection 80.2HA(1) (public display of prohibited terrorist organisation symbols).* >> >> *Consultation requirement* >> >> *(3) The review must provide for public consultation, including providing for public submissions over a period of at least 2 calendar months.* >> >> *Expert panel conducting the review* >> >> *(4) The review must be conducted by an expert panel comprised of 3 members appointed by the Minister.* >> >> *(5) Th
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.