Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2025-02-06.85.1) introduced by the Greens party, which means they were unsuccessful. ### What do these amendments do? These amendments would have replaced the term “intersex status” with “sex characteristics” and introduced the requirement for a review by the Australian Law Reform Commission. ### Amendment text **SHEET 3273** > *(1) Schedule 1, item 4, page 4 (line 16), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 7, page 4 (line 28), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 12, page 6 (line 8), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(4) Schedule 1, item 15, page 6 (line 27), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(5) Schedule 1, item 19, page 8 (line 2), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(6) Schedule 1, item 19, page 8 (line 14), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(7) Schedule 1, item 19, page 9 (line 20), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(8) Schedule 1, item 19, page 10 (line 5), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(9) Schedule 1, item 19, page 11 (line 29), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(10) Schedule 1, item 19, page 12 (line 24), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(11) Schedule 1, item 19, page 14 (line 18), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(12) Schedule 1, item 19, page 15 (line 11), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(13) Schedule 1, item 20, page 18 (line 6), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* **SHEET 3283** > *(1) Page 2 (after line 11), after clause 3, insert:* > >> *4 Review by the Australian Law Reform Commission* >> >> *(1) The Minister must cause a review to be conducted of the
Senate, 2025-02-06. negative: ayes 16, noes 26.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2025-02-06.85.1) introduced by the Greens party, which means they were unsuccessful. ### What do these amendments do? These amendments would have replaced the term “intersex status” with “sex characteristics” and introduced the requirement for a review by the Australian Law Reform Commission. ### Amendment text **SHEET 3273** > *(1) Schedule 1, item 4, page 4 (line 16), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 7, page 4 (line 28), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 12, page 6 (line 8), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(4) Schedule 1, item 15, page 6 (line 27), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(5) Schedule 1, item 19, page 8 (line 2), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(6) Schedule 1, item 19, page 8 (line 14), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(7) Schedule 1, item 19, page 9 (line 20), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(8) Schedule 1, item 19, page 10 (line 5), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(9) Schedule 1, item 19, page 11 (line 29), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(10) Schedule 1, item 19, page 12 (line 24), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(11) Schedule 1, item 19, page 14 (line 18), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(12) Schedule 1, item 19, page 15 (line 11), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* > > *(13) Schedule 1, item 20, page 18 (line 6), omit "intersex status", substitute "sex characteristics".* **SHEET 3283** > *(1) Page 2 (after line 11), after clause 3, insert:* > >> *4 Review by the Australian Law Reform Commission* >> >> *(1) The Minister must cause a review to be conducted of the
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.