Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-11-13.266.1) introduced by ACT Senator [David Pocock](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/act/david_pocock) (Independent), which means they failed. ### What do these amendments do? Senator Pocock [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-11-13.266.1): > *These amendments would place some conditions on the carbon dioxide streams and would also ensure that there is merits review for decisions. ... It's so important that Australian citizens and concerned communities do have an avenue to challenge decisions. I would say it's fundamental to living in a democracy. We've covered a little bit of this ground over the last six days. We could continue, but I'll leave it there.* ### Amendment text > *SHEET 2150* > > *(1) Schedule 1, page 5 (after line 16), after item 3, insert:* > >> *3A After section 21* >> >>> *Insert:* >>> >>> *22 Conditions imposed by this section in respect of permits for the export of certain carbon dioxide streams* >>> >>> *(1) This section applies for each permit for the export of controlled material for dumping, where the controlled material is carbon dioxide streams from carbon dioxide capture processes for sequestration into a sub-seabed geological formation.* >>> >>> *(2) A condition imposed in respect of the permit is that the holder of the permit, for an indefinite period after the permit has been granted, must:* >>> >>>> *(a) monitor whether the export, or any act or omission relating to the sequestration, is likely to cause or result in any condition or damage of the kind set out in paragraph 16(1)(a), (b) or (c); and* >>>> >>>> *(b) ensure the sequestration is maintained (including after the sequestration site is decommissioned) so that such a condition or such damage does not arise; and* >>>> >>>> *(c) repair or remedy any such condition, or mitigate any such damage, as does arise.* >>> >>> *(3) A condition imposed in resp
Senate, 2023-11-13. negative: ayes 14, noes 20.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-11-13.266.1) introduced by ACT Senator [David Pocock](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/act/david_pocock) (Independent), which means they failed. ### What do these amendments do? Senator Pocock [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-11-13.266.1): > *These amendments would place some conditions on the carbon dioxide streams and would also ensure that there is merits review for decisions. ... It's so important that Australian citizens and concerned communities do have an avenue to challenge decisions. I would say it's fundamental to living in a democracy. We've covered a little bit of this ground over the last six days. We could continue, but I'll leave it there.* ### Amendment text > *SHEET 2150* > > *(1) Schedule 1, page 5 (after line 16), after item 3, insert:* > >> *3A After section 21* >> >>> *Insert:* >>> >>> *22 Conditions imposed by this section in respect of permits for the export of certain carbon dioxide streams* >>> >>> *(1) This section applies for each permit for the export of controlled material for dumping, where the controlled material is carbon dioxide streams from carbon dioxide capture processes for sequestration into a sub-seabed geological formation.* >>> >>> *(2) A condition imposed in respect of the permit is that the holder of the permit, for an indefinite period after the permit has been granted, must:* >>> >>>> *(a) monitor whether the export, or any act or omission relating to the sequestration, is likely to cause or result in any condition or damage of the kind set out in paragraph 16(1)(a), (b) or (c); and* >>>> >>>> *(b) ensure the sequestration is maintained (including after the sequestration site is decommissioned) so that such a condition or such damage does not arise; and* >>>> >>>> *(c) repair or remedy any such condition, or mitigate any such damage, as does arise.* >>> >>> *(3) A condition imposed in resp
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.