Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-10-19.52.1) introduced by the Australian Greens, which means it failed. ### Explanation of amendments > *Statement pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000* > > *Amendments (1) and (2)* > >> *Amendments (1) and (2) are framed as requests because they amend the bill to expand the scope of demand driven Commonwealth supported places for Indigenous students to include non-research postgraduate courses of study.* >> >> *The amendments would expand the categories of courses of study that are demand driven higher education courses and expand the circumstances in which Table A higher education providers must enrol students as Commonwealth supported students. This will have the effect of increasing the amounts payable to Table A providers for grants in relation to Commonwealth supported places under Part 2-2 of the Higher Education Act 2003 and increase the number of students who are Commonwealth supported students eligible for HECS-HELP under that Act.* >> >> *The effect of the amendments would increase the amount of expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 238-12 of the Higher Education Act 2003.* >> >> *Statement by the Clerk of the Senate pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000* > > *Amendments (1) and (2)* > >> *If the effect of the amendment is to increase expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 238-12 of the Higher Education Act 2003 then it is in accordance with the precedents of the Senate that the amendment be moved as a request.* ### Amendment text > *Australian Greens' circulated requests for amendments—* > > *That the House of Representatives be requested to make the following amendments:* > > *(1) Schedule 1, page 3 (after line 3), before item 1, insert:* > >> *1A Paragraph 36-30( 1)( aa)* >> >> *After "*undergraduate course of study", insert "or a *demand driven higher education course".* > > *(2) Schedule 1, page 3 (
Senate, 2023-10-19. negative: ayes 12, noes 46.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-10-19.52.1) introduced by the Australian Greens, which means it failed. ### Explanation of amendments > *Statement pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000* > > *Amendments (1) and (2)* > >> *Amendments (1) and (2) are framed as requests because they amend the bill to expand the scope of demand driven Commonwealth supported places for Indigenous students to include non-research postgraduate courses of study.* >> >> *The amendments would expand the categories of courses of study that are demand driven higher education courses and expand the circumstances in which Table A higher education providers must enrol students as Commonwealth supported students. This will have the effect of increasing the amounts payable to Table A providers for grants in relation to Commonwealth supported places under Part 2-2 of the Higher Education Act 2003 and increase the number of students who are Commonwealth supported students eligible for HECS-HELP under that Act.* >> >> *The effect of the amendments would increase the amount of expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 238-12 of the Higher Education Act 2003.* >> >> *Statement by the Clerk of the Senate pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000* > > *Amendments (1) and (2)* > >> *If the effect of the amendment is to increase expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 238-12 of the Higher Education Act 2003 then it is in accordance with the precedents of the Senate that the amendment be moved as a request.* ### Amendment text > *Australian Greens' circulated requests for amendments—* > > *That the House of Representatives be requested to make the following amendments:* > > *(1) Schedule 1, page 3 (after line 3), before item 1, insert:* > >> *1A Paragraph 36-30( 1)( aa)* >> >> *After "*undergraduate course of study", insert "or a *demand driven higher education course".* > > *(2) Schedule 1, page 3 (
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.