Division
The majority voted in favour of an [Opposition amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2022-03-30.249.1) to the usual second reading motion "*that the bill be read a second time.*" Giving a bill a [second reading](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/) is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. This amendment doesn't make any legal changes to the bill itself, but expresses an opinion of the Senate. ### Amendment text > *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:* > > *(a) notes the:* > >> *(i) systemic, ongoing failures in Australia's aged care system as evidenced by the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety and 21 other expert reports since 2013,* >> >> *(ii) inadequacy of the Government's response to the Royal Commission, including an unclear plan for reform implementation and deferred and curtailed legislative action on key issues including, but not limited to, transparency on the use of public aged care funding by aged care providers, and* >> >> *(iii) Government's failures in providing safe, secure and high-quality care for aged care residents due to their historic cuts and poor management of the aged care sector; and* > > *(b) acknowledges the:* > >> *(i) significant issues and concerns raised with the bill by stakeholders including providers, unions and the advocates of older Australians,* >> >> *(ii) particular concerns raised about the consequences of this bill on the ability for aged care providers to recruit and retain staff to provide safe and quality care to older Australians,* >> >> *(iii) Government's lack of action to recruit and retain workers to resolve the growing aged care workforce shortage crisis, and* >> >> *(iv) foundation of any successful reform in the aged care sector must include ensuring there are more workers and that those workers are better paid; and* > > *(c) calls on the Government to urg
Senate, 2022-03-30. affirmative: ayes 28, noes 26.
Question
The majority voted in favour of an [Opposition amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2022-03-30.249.1) to the usual second reading motion "*that the bill be read a second time.*" Giving a bill a [second reading](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/) is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. This amendment doesn't make any legal changes to the bill itself, but expresses an opinion of the Senate. ### Amendment text > *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:* > > *(a) notes the:* > >> *(i) systemic, ongoing failures in Australia's aged care system as evidenced by the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety and 21 other expert reports since 2013,* >> >> *(ii) inadequacy of the Government's response to the Royal Commission, including an unclear plan for reform implementation and deferred and curtailed legislative action on key issues including, but not limited to, transparency on the use of public aged care funding by aged care providers, and* >> >> *(iii) Government's failures in providing safe, secure and high-quality care for aged care residents due to their historic cuts and poor management of the aged care sector; and* > > *(b) acknowledges the:* > >> *(i) significant issues and concerns raised with the bill by stakeholders including providers, unions and the advocates of older Australians,* >> >> *(ii) particular concerns raised about the consequences of this bill on the ability for aged care providers to recruit and retain staff to provide safe and quality care to older Australians,* >> >> *(iii) Government's lack of action to recruit and retain workers to resolve the growing aged care workforce shortage crisis, and* >> >> *(iv) foundation of any successful reform in the aged care sector must include ensuring there are more workers and that those workers are better paid; and* > > *(c) calls on the Government to urg
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.