Skip to content

Menu

Motions - Parliamentary Transparency Charter - Introduce a Charter

Senate, 2019-04-03. negative: ayes 13, noes 44.

Question

The majority voted against a motion ↗︎ introduced by SA Senator Tim Storer ↗︎ (Independent), which means it failed. Senator Storer explained that:

Public confidence in our federal politics is at an all-time low. With scandal after scandal involving corruption, misuse of public funds, political donations, unregulated lobbyists and attacks on whistleblowers, it's no wonder people are fed up. My parliamentary transparency charter aims to improve the integrity of, and public confidence in, our national government. It represents common sense, achievable and deeply needed reform.

Motion text

Parliamentary Transparency Charter

Preamble

Transparency is essential for a well-functioning democracy. The (House of Representatives and the) Senate commit to pursuing the following transparency reforms to improve the integrity of, and public confidence in, our national government.

Reforms

National Integrity Commission

Establish an independent National Integrity Commission to oversee the activities of public officials and empowered to conduct public hearings and make public findings of fact.

Real-time disclosure of political donations above $1,000

Amend political donation laws to require disclosure of donations above $1,000 by recipients in as close to 'real-time' as practical.

Enhanced freedom of information arrangements

Boost funding to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner and FOI units within departments and agencies and improve FOI review processing times.

Enhanced whistleblower protections

Further consolidate the whistleblower protection regime and enhance existing whistleblower protections.

Overhaul lobbyist rules

*Legislate lobbying code of conduct and require lobbyists to disclose who they meet with and the subject matter of their meeting on a monthly basis

View original

How each member voted

How each party voted

Party labels are those recorded for this division, rather than current affiliations.

Noes

Ayes

Related bills

Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.

An association does not prove influence.