Motions - Parliamentary Transparency Charter - Introduce a Charter
Senate, 2019-04-03. negative: ayes 13, noes 44.
Question
The majority voted against a motion ↗︎ introduced by SA Senator Tim Storer ↗︎ (Independent), which means it failed. Senator Storer explained that:
Public confidence in our federal politics is at an all-time low. With scandal after scandal involving corruption, misuse of public funds, political donations, unregulated lobbyists and attacks on whistleblowers, it's no wonder people are fed up. My parliamentary transparency charter aims to improve the integrity of, and public confidence in, our national government. It represents common sense, achievable and deeply needed reform.
Motion text
Parliamentary Transparency Charter
Preamble
Transparency is essential for a well-functioning democracy. The (House of Representatives and the) Senate commit to pursuing the following transparency reforms to improve the integrity of, and public confidence in, our national government.
Reforms
National Integrity Commission
Establish an independent National Integrity Commission to oversee the activities of public officials and empowered to conduct public hearings and make public findings of fact.
Real-time disclosure of political donations above $1,000
Amend political donation laws to require disclosure of donations above $1,000 by recipients in as close to 'real-time' as practical.
Enhanced freedom of information arrangements
Boost funding to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner and FOI units within departments and agencies and improve FOI review processing times.
Enhanced whistleblower protections
Further consolidate the whistleblower protection regime and enhance existing whistleblower protections.
Overhaul lobbyist rules
*Legislate lobbying code of conduct and require lobbyists to disclose who they meet with and the subject matter of their meeting on a monthly basis
How each member voted
How each party voted
Party labels are those recorded for this division, rather than current affiliations.
- Labor: no 20
- Liberal: no 18
- Derryn Hinch's Justice Party: no 1
- Liberal Democratic Party: no 1
- Greens: aye 9
- Nationals: no 1
- One Nation: aye 1
- Independent: aye 2, no 1
- PRES: no 2
- Centre Alliance: aye 1
Noes
- Alex Gallacher (Labor) — no
- Amanda Stoker (Liberal) — no
- Anne Ruston (Liberal) — no
- Anne Urquhart (Labor) — no
- Arthur Sinodinos (Liberal) — no
- Catryna Bilyk (Labor) — no
- Chris Ketter (Labor) — no
- Claire Moore (Labor) — no
- David Fawcett (Liberal) — no
- David Smith (Labor) — no
- Dean Smith (Liberal) — no
- Deborah O'Neill (Labor) — no
- Derryn Hinch (Derryn Hinch's Justice Party) — no
- Doug Cameron (Labor) — no
- Duncan Spender (Liberal Democratic Party) — no
- Eric Abetz (Liberal) — no
- Gavin Marshall (Labor) — no
- Glenn Sterle (Labor) — no
- Helen Polley (Labor) — no
- Ian Macdonald (Liberal) — no
- James Paterson (Liberal) — no
- Jane Hume (Liberal) — no
- Jenny McAllister (Labor) — no
- Jim Molan (Liberal) — no
- John Williams (Nationals) — no
- Jonathon Duniam (Liberal) — no
- Kim Carr (Labor) — no
- Kimberley Kitching (Labor) — no
- Kristina Keneally (Labor) — no
- Louise Pratt (Labor) — no
- Lucy Gichuhi (Liberal) — no
- Malarndirri McCarthy (Labor) — no
- Marise Payne (Liberal) — no
- Mitch Fifield (Liberal) — no
- Murray Watt (Labor) — no
- Patrick Dodson (Labor) — no
- Raff Ciccone (Labor) — no
- Richard Colbeck (Liberal) — no
- Scott Ryan (PRES) — no
- Simon Birmingham (Liberal) — no
- Steve Martin (Independent) — no
- Sue Lines (PRES) — no
- Wendy Askew (Liberal) — no
- Zed Seselja (Liberal) — no
Ayes
- Janet Rice (Greens) — aye
- Jordon Steele-John (Greens) — aye
- Larissa Waters (Greens) — aye
- Mehreen Faruqi (Greens) — aye
- Nick McKim (Greens) — aye
- Peter Georgiou (One Nation) — aye
- Peter Whish-Wilson (Greens) — aye
- Rachel Siewert (Greens) — aye
- Rex Patrick (Independent) — aye
- Richard Di Natale (Greens) — aye
- Sarah Hanson-Young (Greens) — aye
- Stirling Griff (Centre Alliance) — aye
- Tim Storer (Independent) — aye
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.
An association does not prove influence.