Division
Don Farrell By leave—as has been circulated on the grey, I move opposition amendments (1) to (6) and (8) to (11) on sheet 8060: (1) Clause 1, page 1 (lines 5 and 6), omit "Serious or Organised", substitute "Serious and Organised". (2) Schedule 1, item 2, page 3 (lines 9 and 10), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (3) Schedule 1, item 3, page 3 (line 15), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (4) Schedule 1, item 4, page 3 (line 18), omit "Serious or organised", substitute "Serious and organised". (5) Schedule 1, item 4, page 3 (line 21), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (6) Schedule 1, item 4, page 3 (line 24), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (8) Schedule 1, item 7, page 5 (line 3), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (9) Schedule 1, item 12, page 5 (line 22), omit "Serious or organised", substitute "Serious and organised". (10) Schedule 1, item 12, page 5 (lines 25 and 26), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (11) Schedule 1, item 12, page 6 (line 4), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". Amendments (1) to (6) and (8) to (11) change the phrase 'serious or organised' crime to 'serious and organised' crime throughout the bill. It is a uniform change and will impact the aviation and maritime bills in exactly the same manner. It is important that we get the language right when we are adding new purposes to important legislation. We need to ensure that we are targeting identified problems in a precise manner. As Labor members in this place said in the last parliament when an identical bill was put forward, we are concerned that the mission of transport security remains tightly focused around managing the post-9/11 security environment. Currently that is about safeguarding unlawful interference at our regulated airports and seaports, and really focuses on terror-relat
Senate, 2017-03-27. affirmative: ayes 31, noes 28.
Question
Don Farrell By leave—as has been circulated on the grey, I move opposition amendments (1) to (6) and (8) to (11) on sheet 8060: (1) Clause 1, page 1 (lines 5 and 6), omit "Serious or Organised", substitute "Serious and Organised". (2) Schedule 1, item 2, page 3 (lines 9 and 10), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (3) Schedule 1, item 3, page 3 (line 15), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (4) Schedule 1, item 4, page 3 (line 18), omit "Serious or organised", substitute "Serious and organised". (5) Schedule 1, item 4, page 3 (line 21), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (6) Schedule 1, item 4, page 3 (line 24), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (8) Schedule 1, item 7, page 5 (line 3), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (9) Schedule 1, item 12, page 5 (line 22), omit "Serious or organised", substitute "Serious and organised". (10) Schedule 1, item 12, page 5 (lines 25 and 26), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (11) Schedule 1, item 12, page 6 (line 4), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". Amendments (1) to (6) and (8) to (11) change the phrase 'serious or organised' crime to 'serious and organised' crime throughout the bill. It is a uniform change and will impact the aviation and maritime bills in exactly the same manner. It is important that we get the language right when we are adding new purposes to important legislation. We need to ensure that we are targeting identified problems in a precise manner. As Labor members in this place said in the last parliament when an identical bill was put forward, we are concerned that the mission of transport security remains tightly focused around managing the post-9/11 security environment. Currently that is about safeguarding unlawful interference at our regulated airports and seaports, and really focuses on terror-relat
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.