Division
Sue Lines I will now deal with the amendments circulated by Senator David Pocock. The question is that amendments on sheet 3905 be agreed to. _Senator David Pocock's circulated amendments—_ (1) Clause 2, page 2 (table item 4), omit the table item, substitute: (2) Clause 2, page 2 (after line 9), at the end of the clause, add: (3) For the purposes of item 4A of the table in subsection (1), a relevant inquiry report means an inquiry report prepared under section 164 of the _National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022_ following a public inquiry conducted under section 161 of that Act into: (a) corruption risks and vulnerabilities in Commonwealth agencies arising from the design, implementation, administration or enforcement of preferences in Commonwealth procurement, grants or contractual arrangements, including preferences that are required or authorised in Commonwealth-linked supply chains, based on whether employees of an employer are covered, or are proposed to be covered, by: (i) an enterprise agreement; or (ii) a kind of enterprise agreement; or (iii) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee organisation; and (b) measures to prevent corruption in Commonwealth agencies in connection with those preferences, including safeguards relating to the following: (i) probity and conflicts of interest; (ii) transparency and record-keeping; (iii) supplier selection and tender evaluation; (iv) grants administration; (v) subcontractor and supply-chain requirements that are imposed, required or authorised through Commonwealth procurement, grants or contractual arrangements; (vi) the use of procurement-connected policies, grants-connected policies, codes, guidelines or model contract terms, including any policy or code known as the Secure Australian Jobs Code; (vii) any legislative instrument that could be made under subsection 354(2C) or section 378A of the _Fair Work Act 2009_ if Part 9 of Schedule 1 to this Act commences; (viii) any contractual arrangement, or Commonw
Senate, 2026-06-29. negative: ayes 24, noes 32.
Question
Sue Lines I will now deal with the amendments circulated by Senator David Pocock. The question is that amendments on sheet 3905 be agreed to. _Senator David Pocock's circulated amendments—_ (1) Clause 2, page 2 (table item 4), omit the table item, substitute: (2) Clause 2, page 2 (after line 9), at the end of the clause, add: (3) For the purposes of item 4A of the table in subsection (1), a relevant inquiry report means an inquiry report prepared under section 164 of the _National Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2022_ following a public inquiry conducted under section 161 of that Act into: (a) corruption risks and vulnerabilities in Commonwealth agencies arising from the design, implementation, administration or enforcement of preferences in Commonwealth procurement, grants or contractual arrangements, including preferences that are required or authorised in Commonwealth-linked supply chains, based on whether employees of an employer are covered, or are proposed to be covered, by: (i) an enterprise agreement; or (ii) a kind of enterprise agreement; or (iii) an enterprise agreement that covers an employee organisation; and (b) measures to prevent corruption in Commonwealth agencies in connection with those preferences, including safeguards relating to the following: (i) probity and conflicts of interest; (ii) transparency and record-keeping; (iii) supplier selection and tender evaluation; (iv) grants administration; (v) subcontractor and supply-chain requirements that are imposed, required or authorised through Commonwealth procurement, grants or contractual arrangements; (vi) the use of procurement-connected policies, grants-connected policies, codes, guidelines or model contract terms, including any policy or code known as the Secure Australian Jobs Code; (vii) any legislative instrument that could be made under subsection 354(2C) or section 378A of the _Fair Work Act 2009_ if Part 9 of Schedule 1 to this Act commences; (viii) any contractual arrangement, or Commonw
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.