Menu

Division

Sue Lines Prior to today, Senator David Pocock moved a second reading amendment relating to the Future Made in Australia Bill 2024 and the Future Made in Australia (Omnibus Amendments No. 1) Bill 2024: At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate: (a) notes that: (i) the electrification of households and small businesses would result in thousands of dollars of savings a year and significantly reduce Australia's domestic emissions, (ii) the United States' Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, to which this bill is partially a response, included significant measures to encourage household electrification and those measures are considered a success, and (iii) the failure to include electrification in the Future Made in Australia framework is a significant missed opportunity; and (b) calls on the Government to urgently provide an ambitious package to encourage the electrification of Australian households and small businesses with a focus on low-income households, rental properties and apartments". The question is that the second reading amendment moved by Senator David Pocock on sheet 2870 be agreed to. Question negatived. The next question is that the second reading amendment circulated by Senator Van on sheet 2868 be agreed to. _Senator Van's circulated amendment__in respect of the_ _Future Made in Australia Bill 2024 and the Future Made in Australia (Omnibus Amendments No. 1) Bill 2024_ At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate calls on the Government to: (a) provide for the Australian Defence Force (ADF) to enter into offtake agreements for low-carbon fuel sources to ensure that at least 30% of the ADF's fuel consumption by 2028 is sourced from biodiesel, sustainable aviation fuel, or other low-carbon alternatives, with priority given to domestic producers; (b) establish Renewable Energy Industrial Precincts in areas with high renewable energy generation capacity which: (i) give priority access to government grants and infrastructure subsidies to industries that

Senate, 2024-11-28. affirmative: ayes 33, noes 23.

Question

Sue Lines Prior to today, Senator David Pocock moved a second reading amendment relating to the Future Made in Australia Bill 2024 and the Future Made in Australia (Omnibus Amendments No. 1) Bill 2024: At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate: (a) notes that: (i) the electrification of households and small businesses would result in thousands of dollars of savings a year and significantly reduce Australia's domestic emissions, (ii) the United States' Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, to which this bill is partially a response, included significant measures to encourage household electrification and those measures are considered a success, and (iii) the failure to include electrification in the Future Made in Australia framework is a significant missed opportunity; and (b) calls on the Government to urgently provide an ambitious package to encourage the electrification of Australian households and small businesses with a focus on low-income households, rental properties and apartments". The question is that the second reading amendment moved by Senator David Pocock on sheet 2870 be agreed to. Question negatived. The next question is that the second reading amendment circulated by Senator Van on sheet 2868 be agreed to. _Senator Van's circulated amendment__in respect of the_ _Future Made in Australia Bill 2024 and the Future Made in Australia (Omnibus Amendments No. 1) Bill 2024_ At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate calls on the Government to: (a) provide for the Australian Defence Force (ADF) to enter into offtake agreements for low-carbon fuel sources to ensure that at least 30% of the ADF's fuel consumption by 2028 is sourced from biodiesel, sustainable aviation fuel, or other low-carbon alternatives, with priority given to domestic producers; (b) establish Renewable Energy Industrial Precincts in areas with high renewable energy generation capacity which: (i) give priority access to government grants and infrastructure subsidies to industries that

View original

How each member voted

Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.

Related bills

Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.