Division
The majority voted against parts (b) to (g) of an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2026-03-31.224.1) introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Claire Chandler](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/claire_chandler) (Liberal), which means they were not successful. Had it been successful, the amendment would have added the text below to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). ### Amendment text > *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate notes that: ...* > > *(b) the Government initially denied there was a fuel supply problem in Australia and by delaying taking action to ensure distribution of fuel to where it was needed, exacerbated price pressures and supply shortages;* > > *(c) the Government delayed acting on cost-of-living relief despite mounting pressure on Australian households, small businesses and transporters;* > > *(d) the Government has failed to provide any budget offsets or outline how this measure will be funded, increasing the risk of additional inflationary pressure—where the only fuel guaranteed is for inflation, not for farmers or families;* > > *(e) within 24 hours of the announcement, the Government's proposed GST arrangements have already fallen into disarray, raising further concerns about fiscal credibility and coordination;* > > *(f) uncertainty remains regarding fuel supply security and the risk of heavy-handed market interventions; and* > > *(g) Australians deserve timely leadership and responsible economic management during this national fuel crisis".*
Senate, 2026-03-31. negative: ayes 25, noes 34.
Question
The majority voted against parts (b) to (g) of an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2026-03-31.224.1) introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Claire Chandler](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/claire_chandler) (Liberal), which means they were not successful. Had it been successful, the amendment would have added the text below to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). ### Amendment text > *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate notes that: ...* > > *(b) the Government initially denied there was a fuel supply problem in Australia and by delaying taking action to ensure distribution of fuel to where it was needed, exacerbated price pressures and supply shortages;* > > *(c) the Government delayed acting on cost-of-living relief despite mounting pressure on Australian households, small businesses and transporters;* > > *(d) the Government has failed to provide any budget offsets or outline how this measure will be funded, increasing the risk of additional inflationary pressure—where the only fuel guaranteed is for inflation, not for farmers or families;* > > *(e) within 24 hours of the announcement, the Government's proposed GST arrangements have already fallen into disarray, raising further concerns about fiscal credibility and coordination;* > > *(f) uncertainty remains regarding fuel supply security and the risk of heavy-handed market interventions; and* > > *(g) Australians deserve timely leadership and responsible economic management during this national fuel crisis".*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.