Division
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr7192_amend_95b0d38f-7035-4d64-8f90-33dcc733b6a8%22;rec=0) introduced by Ryan MP [Elizabeth Watson-Brown](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/ryan/elizabeth_watson-brown) (Greens) to an [original amendment](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/divisions/representatives/2024-07-03/3) introduced by Fairfax MP [Ted O'Brien](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/fairfax/ted_o'brien) (Liberal), which means it failed. ### Amendment text > *That all words after “House” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *(1) notes that the Government has broken its commitment to create laws that protect nature;* > > *(2) notes that these three bills will not protect wildlife, will not stop native forest logging and will not stop the continued expansion of coal and gas;* > > *(3) calls on the Government to amend this legislation to:* > >> *(a) end native forest logging and the destruction of critical habitat;* >> >> *(b) assess projects properly for their climate impacts to stop the expansion of further fossil fuels; and* >> >> *(c) commit to a timeframe for an exposure draft of standalone cultural heritage legislation”.* ### Original amendment > *That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *“the House:* > > *(1) expresses its commitment to making changes to national environmental laws that are genuinely beneficial for both the environment and business;* > > *(2) notes that these three bills do not meaningfully improve Australia’s environmental laws, and that they have particular shortcomings in each of the following forms :* > >> *(a) the expansion of the EPA’s proposed remit well beyond the compliance and data functions promised by the ALP in 2022;* >> >> *(b) the excessive size, and lack of proportionalit
House of Representatives, 2024-07-03. negative: ayes 9, noes 93.
Question
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr7192_amend_95b0d38f-7035-4d64-8f90-33dcc733b6a8%22;rec=0) introduced by Ryan MP [Elizabeth Watson-Brown](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/ryan/elizabeth_watson-brown) (Greens) to an [original amendment](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/divisions/representatives/2024-07-03/3) introduced by Fairfax MP [Ted O'Brien](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/fairfax/ted_o'brien) (Liberal), which means it failed. ### Amendment text > *That all words after “House” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *(1) notes that the Government has broken its commitment to create laws that protect nature;* > > *(2) notes that these three bills will not protect wildlife, will not stop native forest logging and will not stop the continued expansion of coal and gas;* > > *(3) calls on the Government to amend this legislation to:* > >> *(a) end native forest logging and the destruction of critical habitat;* >> >> *(b) assess projects properly for their climate impacts to stop the expansion of further fossil fuels; and* >> >> *(c) commit to a timeframe for an exposure draft of standalone cultural heritage legislation”.* ### Original amendment > *That all words after “That” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *“the House:* > > *(1) expresses its commitment to making changes to national environmental laws that are genuinely beneficial for both the environment and business;* > > *(2) notes that these three bills do not meaningfully improve Australia’s environmental laws, and that they have particular shortcomings in each of the following forms :* > >> *(a) the expansion of the EPA’s proposed remit well beyond the compliance and data functions promised by the ALP in 2022;* >> >> *(b) the excessive size, and lack of proportionalit
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.