Division
The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2023-05-24.185.2) (1), (5), (6), and (9) to (11), which were introduced by Bradfield MP [Paul Fletcher](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/bradfield/paul_fletcher) (Liberal). This means they failed. ### Amendment text Mr Fletcher [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2023-05-24.185.2): > *Amendment (1) will insert into the bill a review of schedule 2 of the bill, which relates to the Paid Parental Leave scheme, which must start after a period of six months of operation of the schedule. Amendments (5) and (6) operate to guarantee that employers who are found to underpay super as a result of an administrative binding order or other arrangement provided by the Australian Taxation Office will not receive a pecuniary penalty from a court. Amendments (9) and (10) together have the effect of clarifying what in fact would constitute eligible wages for the purposes of the long service leave levy and will accordingly make it clearer for employers and employees as to what would constitute eligible wages. Amendment (11) would address the notice period required for flexible unpaid parental. I commend these amendments to the chamber.* ### Amendment text > *(1) Page 3 (after line 8), after clause 3, insert:* > >> *4 Review of operation of unpaid parental leave amendments* >> >> *(1) The Minister must cause a review to be conducted of the operation of the amendments made by Schedule 2 to this Act.* >> >> *(3) The review must start as soon as practicable after the end of the period of 6 months after the commencement of Schedule 2.* >> >> *(4) The persons who conduct the review must give the Minister a written report of the review within 3 months of the commencement of the review.* >> >> *(5) The Minister must cause a copy of the report of the review to be tabled in each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after
House of Representatives, 2023-05-25. affirmative: ayes 79, noes 62.
Question
The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2023-05-24.185.2) (1), (5), (6), and (9) to (11), which were introduced by Bradfield MP [Paul Fletcher](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/bradfield/paul_fletcher) (Liberal). This means they failed. ### Amendment text Mr Fletcher [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2023-05-24.185.2): > *Amendment (1) will insert into the bill a review of schedule 2 of the bill, which relates to the Paid Parental Leave scheme, which must start after a period of six months of operation of the schedule. Amendments (5) and (6) operate to guarantee that employers who are found to underpay super as a result of an administrative binding order or other arrangement provided by the Australian Taxation Office will not receive a pecuniary penalty from a court. Amendments (9) and (10) together have the effect of clarifying what in fact would constitute eligible wages for the purposes of the long service leave levy and will accordingly make it clearer for employers and employees as to what would constitute eligible wages. Amendment (11) would address the notice period required for flexible unpaid parental. I commend these amendments to the chamber.* ### Amendment text > *(1) Page 3 (after line 8), after clause 3, insert:* > >> *4 Review of operation of unpaid parental leave amendments* >> >> *(1) The Minister must cause a review to be conducted of the operation of the amendments made by Schedule 2 to this Act.* >> >> *(3) The review must start as soon as practicable after the end of the period of 6 months after the commencement of Schedule 2.* >> >> *(4) The persons who conduct the review must give the Minister a written report of the review within 3 months of the commencement of the review.* >> >> *(5) The Minister must cause a copy of the report of the review to be tabled in each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.