Skip to content

Menu

Division

The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2023-05-11.132.1) introduced by Farrer MP [Sussan Ley](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/farrer/sussan_ley) (Liberal), which means it failed. ### What do these amendments do? Ms Farrer [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2023-05-11.132.1): > *The coalition is moving these amendments to alter the time line under which a review into the operation of the act must commence and to ensure a geographical spread of appointees.* ### Amendment text > *(4) Schedule 1, item 37, page 18 (line 4), omit "2 years", substitute "12 months".*

House of Representatives, 2023-05-11. affirmative: ayes 83, noes 59.

Question

The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2023-05-11.132.1) introduced by Farrer MP [Sussan Ley](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/farrer/sussan_ley) (Liberal), which means it failed. ### What do these amendments do? Ms Farrer [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2023-05-11.132.1): > *The coalition is moving these amendments to alter the time line under which a review into the operation of the act must commence and to ensure a geographical spread of appointees.* ### Amendment text > *(4) Schedule 1, item 37, page 18 (line 4), omit "2 years", substitute "12 months".*

View original

How each member voted

Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.

Related bills

Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.