Division
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-11-24.64.3) to *disagree* with [amendment (1) and (2)](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-11-24.63.1) introduced by Mayo MP [Rebekha Sharkie](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/mayo/rebekha_sharkie) (Centre Alliance), which means they failed. ### What did the amendment do? Ms Sharkie [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-11-24.63.1): > *The first really relates to the fact that I think it's important to provide as much clarity as possible with respect to what must be put into the review. I'm sure it is self-explanatory. You would expect these points—the role of the NACC, the oversight of the NACC, the use and conduct of hearings, and emerging best practice—to be in a review. But this is really to make sure that we don't assume that it is really quite plain and simple.* > > *Amendment (2) is to ensure that the minister—whoever the minister of the day is, for many parliaments to come—does provide to the parliament in a very timely manner a copy of the report of the review. What we have seen in the past—perhaps not in this parliament but in the past in parliaments gone by—is that sometimes ministers of the day have held on to reviews for a very long period of time and perhaps also released them at times when the rest of Australia is not paying attention. So this is really just about timeliness and about some detail of what is in that review.* Read more about the bill in its [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2223a/23bd035). ### Amendment text > *(1) Clause 278, page 219 (after line 8), after subclause (1), insert:* > >> *(1A) Without limiting subsection (1), the review must consider and report on the following:* >> >>> *(a) the role of the NACC;* >>> >>> *(b) oversight of the NACC;* >>> >>> *(c) the use and conduct of hearings;* >>> >>> *(d) emerging best practice.* > > *
House of Representatives, 2022-11-24. affirmative: ayes 70, noes 65.
Question
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-11-24.64.3) to *disagree* with [amendment (1) and (2)](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-11-24.63.1) introduced by Mayo MP [Rebekha Sharkie](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/mayo/rebekha_sharkie) (Centre Alliance), which means they failed. ### What did the amendment do? Ms Sharkie [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-11-24.63.1): > *The first really relates to the fact that I think it's important to provide as much clarity as possible with respect to what must be put into the review. I'm sure it is self-explanatory. You would expect these points—the role of the NACC, the oversight of the NACC, the use and conduct of hearings, and emerging best practice—to be in a review. But this is really to make sure that we don't assume that it is really quite plain and simple.* > > *Amendment (2) is to ensure that the minister—whoever the minister of the day is, for many parliaments to come—does provide to the parliament in a very timely manner a copy of the report of the review. What we have seen in the past—perhaps not in this parliament but in the past in parliaments gone by—is that sometimes ministers of the day have held on to reviews for a very long period of time and perhaps also released them at times when the rest of Australia is not paying attention. So this is really just about timeliness and about some detail of what is in that review.* Read more about the bill in its [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2223a/23bd035). ### Amendment text > *(1) Clause 278, page 219 (after line 8), after subclause (1), insert:* > >> *(1A) Without limiting subsection (1), the review must consider and report on the following:* >> >>> *(a) the role of the NACC;* >>> >>> *(b) oversight of the NACC;* >>> >>> *(c) the use and conduct of hearings;* >>> >>> *(d) emerging best practice.* > > *
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.