Division
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-11-24.38.4) to *disagree* with [amendments (8) and (9)](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-11-24.35.1) introduced by Indi MP [Helen Haines](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/indi/helen_haines) (Independent), which means they failed. #### Rebellion Bass MP [Bridget Archer](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/bass/bridget_archer) (Liberal) [crossed the floor](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/help/faq#rebel) to vote "No" against the rest of the Liberal party, who voted "Yes". ### What did the amendment do? Dr Haines [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-11-24.35.1): > *These amendments enhance budgetary transparency and oversight of the National Anti-Corruption Commission.* > > *... This amendment will also require the minister to table a statement of reasons if they deviate from the recommendations of the National Anti-Corruption Commission joint select oversight committee in relation to the budget. The amendment provides an additional layer of oversight and transparency over the National Anti-Corruption Commission's budget by requiring the government of the day to respond to a report regarding the adequacy of the NACC's budget.* > > *... My amendments also require the parliamentary joint committee to review the Anti-Corruption Commission's budget every 12 months. This amendment will ensure regular review of the NACC's budgets and prevent the powerful budget oversight power from going unused.* Read more about the bill in its [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2223a/23bd035). ### Amendment text > *(8) Clause 177, page 144 (line 19), before "to review", insert "at least once every 12 months,".* > > *(9) Clause 177, page 144 (after line 30), after subclause (2), insert:* > >> *(2A) If:* >> >>> *(a) in a report mentioned in paragraph (1)(g), the Committee make
House of Representatives, 2022-11-24. affirmative: ayes 50, noes 16.
Question
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-11-24.38.4) to *disagree* with [amendments (8) and (9)](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-11-24.35.1) introduced by Indi MP [Helen Haines](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/indi/helen_haines) (Independent), which means they failed. #### Rebellion Bass MP [Bridget Archer](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/bass/bridget_archer) (Liberal) [crossed the floor](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/help/faq#rebel) to vote "No" against the rest of the Liberal party, who voted "Yes". ### What did the amendment do? Dr Haines [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-11-24.35.1): > *These amendments enhance budgetary transparency and oversight of the National Anti-Corruption Commission.* > > *... This amendment will also require the minister to table a statement of reasons if they deviate from the recommendations of the National Anti-Corruption Commission joint select oversight committee in relation to the budget. The amendment provides an additional layer of oversight and transparency over the National Anti-Corruption Commission's budget by requiring the government of the day to respond to a report regarding the adequacy of the NACC's budget.* > > *... My amendments also require the parliamentary joint committee to review the Anti-Corruption Commission's budget every 12 months. This amendment will ensure regular review of the NACC's budgets and prevent the powerful budget oversight power from going unused.* Read more about the bill in its [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2223a/23bd035). ### Amendment text > *(8) Clause 177, page 144 (line 19), before "to review", insert "at least once every 12 months,".* > > *(9) Clause 177, page 144 (after line 30), after subclause (2), insert:* > >> *(2A) If:* >> >>> *(a) in a report mentioned in paragraph (1)(g), the Committee make
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.