Division
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-17.19.4) to keep the usual second reading motion unchanged. In parliamentary jargon, they voted "*that the words proposed to be omitted stand part of the question.*" The usual second reading motion is "*that the bill be read a [second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/),*" which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. This vote took place after Franklin MP [Julie Collins](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/franklin/julie_collins) (Labor) proposed the amendment below. ### Proposed amendment text > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes:* > > *(1) the importance of ensuring computerised systems are only used in simple and uniform cases to guarantee consistency and accuracy; and* > > *(2) that the Coalition Government has backflipped on its plan to introduce the biosecurity imports levy."*
House of Representatives, 2021-02-17. affirmative: ayes 66, noes 56.
Question
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-17.19.4) to keep the usual second reading motion unchanged. In parliamentary jargon, they voted "*that the words proposed to be omitted stand part of the question.*" The usual second reading motion is "*that the bill be read a [second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/),*" which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. This vote took place after Franklin MP [Julie Collins](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/franklin/julie_collins) (Labor) proposed the amendment below. ### Proposed amendment text > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes:* > > *(1) the importance of ensuring computerised systems are only used in simple and uniform cases to guarantee consistency and accuracy; and* > > *(2) that the Coalition Government has backflipped on its plan to introduce the biosecurity imports levy."*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.