Division
The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-15.153.1) introduced by Melbourne MP [Adam Bandt](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/melbourne/adam_bandt) (Greens), which means it failed. Mr Bandt [explained the reason](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-15.153.1) behind his motion: > *There is a loophole that has been open since November 2019 that is hampering the work of the disability royal commission and that is stopping people having the confidence to come and tell their stories.* ### Motion text > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words—* > > *"the Bill be considered immediately".*
House of Representatives, 2021-02-15. affirmative: ayes 64, noes 59.
Question
The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-15.153.1) introduced by Melbourne MP [Adam Bandt](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/melbourne/adam_bandt) (Greens), which means it failed. Mr Bandt [explained the reason](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-15.153.1) behind his motion: > *There is a loophole that has been open since November 2019 that is hampering the work of the disability royal commission and that is stopping people having the confidence to come and tell their stories.* ### Motion text > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words—* > > *"the Bill be considered immediately".*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.