Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2017-12-07.50.1) introduced by Treasurer [Scott Morrison](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/cook/scott_morrison), which means they failed. ### What are the amendments? Morrison MP [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2017-12-07.50.1) his amendments would make sure that faith based and religious organisations: > *will be able to continue to simply do what they have been doing ... without any question or any doubt about their status, in particular their charitable status, or any doubt or question about their ability to receive public funding for the work that they do, or any doubt that could be expressed on that in terms of them continuing to hold a view about marriage in its traditional understanding. They are simply seeking for the status quo for them to be maintained and to have an assurance.* ### Why did some Coalition MPs vote Yes and others No? The Coalition was split on this issue, with some voting Yes and others voting No. This split within the party is unusual but, given the nature of the subject matter of the vote, the Coalition decided to run this as a free vote, meaning that its members could vote however they chose rather than having to vote along party lines. ### What does this bill do? This [bill](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/s1099) will allow same-sex couples to marry under Australian law. However, it will also: > *enable ministers of religion, religious marriage celebrants, chaplains and bodies established for religious purposes to refuse to solemnise or provide facilities, goods and services for marriages on religious grounds; and make amendments ... to provide that a refusal by a minister of religion, religious marriage celebrant or chaplain to solemnise marriage in prescribed circumstances does not constitute unlawful discrimination.* Read more in the [bills di
House of Representatives, 2017-12-07. negative: ayes 60, noes 82.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2017-12-07.50.1) introduced by Treasurer [Scott Morrison](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/cook/scott_morrison), which means they failed. ### What are the amendments? Morrison MP [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2017-12-07.50.1) his amendments would make sure that faith based and religious organisations: > *will be able to continue to simply do what they have been doing ... without any question or any doubt about their status, in particular their charitable status, or any doubt or question about their ability to receive public funding for the work that they do, or any doubt that could be expressed on that in terms of them continuing to hold a view about marriage in its traditional understanding. They are simply seeking for the status quo for them to be maintained and to have an assurance.* ### Why did some Coalition MPs vote Yes and others No? The Coalition was split on this issue, with some voting Yes and others voting No. This split within the party is unusual but, given the nature of the subject matter of the vote, the Coalition decided to run this as a free vote, meaning that its members could vote however they chose rather than having to vote along party lines. ### What does this bill do? This [bill](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/s1099) will allow same-sex couples to marry under Australian law. However, it will also: > *enable ministers of religion, religious marriage celebrants, chaplains and bodies established for religious purposes to refuse to solemnise or provide facilities, goods and services for marriages on religious grounds; and make amendments ... to provide that a refusal by a minister of religion, religious marriage celebrant or chaplain to solemnise marriage in prescribed circumstances does not constitute unlawful discrimination.* Read more in the [bills di
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.