Division
Anthony Albanese by leave—I move amendments (1) to (6) and (8) to (11) as circulated in my name together: (1) Clause 1, page 1 (lines 5 and 6), omit "Serious or Organised", substitute "Serious and Organised". (2) Schedule 1, item 2, page 3 (lines 9 and 10), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (3) Schedule 1, item 3, page 3 (line 15), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (4) Schedule 1, item 4, page 3 (line 18), omit "Serious or organised", substitute "Serious and organised". (5) Schedule 1, item 4, page 3 (line 21), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (6) Schedule 1, item 4, page 3 (line 24), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (8) Schedule 1, item 7, page 5 (line 3), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (9) Schedule 1, item 12, page 5 (line 22), omit "Serious or organised", substitute "Serious and organised". (10) Schedule 1, item 12, page 5 (lines 25 and 26), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (11) Schedule 1, item 12, page 6 (line 4), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". The amendments that I have moved in this first section are amendments relating to the distinction between 'serious or organised' and 'serious and organised'. This is not just a question of language; it is a question of language translating into action when it comes to legislation. The significance of this is that the amendments that I have moved are consistent with the recommendations of the National Ice Taskforce and the Joint Committee on Law Enforcement report from 2011. That is the basis of the Transport Security Amendment (Serious or Organised Crime) Bill 2016. These amendments would replace the statement—including the title, it must be said—of the bill throughout this legislation. It is a uniform change and will impact the aviation and maritime bills in the same manner. It is important that we
House of Representatives, 2017-02-13. negative: ayes 66, noes 77.
Question
Anthony Albanese by leave—I move amendments (1) to (6) and (8) to (11) as circulated in my name together: (1) Clause 1, page 1 (lines 5 and 6), omit "Serious or Organised", substitute "Serious and Organised". (2) Schedule 1, item 2, page 3 (lines 9 and 10), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (3) Schedule 1, item 3, page 3 (line 15), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (4) Schedule 1, item 4, page 3 (line 18), omit "Serious or organised", substitute "Serious and organised". (5) Schedule 1, item 4, page 3 (line 21), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (6) Schedule 1, item 4, page 3 (line 24), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (8) Schedule 1, item 7, page 5 (line 3), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (9) Schedule 1, item 12, page 5 (line 22), omit "Serious or organised", substitute "Serious and organised". (10) Schedule 1, item 12, page 5 (lines 25 and 26), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". (11) Schedule 1, item 12, page 6 (line 4), omit "serious or organised", substitute "serious and organised". The amendments that I have moved in this first section are amendments relating to the distinction between 'serious or organised' and 'serious and organised'. This is not just a question of language; it is a question of language translating into action when it comes to legislation. The significance of this is that the amendments that I have moved are consistent with the recommendations of the National Ice Taskforce and the Joint Committee on Law Enforcement report from 2011. That is the basis of the Transport Security Amendment (Serious or Organised Crime) Bill 2016. These amendments would replace the statement—including the title, it must be said—of the bill throughout this legislation. It is a uniform change and will impact the aviation and maritime bills in the same manner. It is important that we
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.