Division
The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2017-02-13.29.3) introduced by Labor MP [Anthony Albanese](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/grayndler/anthony_albanese), which means it failed. ### Motion text > *That all the words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > *"whilst not declining to give the Bill a [second reading](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html), the House:* > *(1) notes that the Government failed to articulate a policy for the aviation or maritime sectors at the 2016 Federal election;* > *(2) notes the Turnbull Government's failed WorkChoices On Water legislation would have seriously undermined the Australian maritime sector;* > *(3) notes in particular that the Government has:* >> *(a) failed to rule out further laws in coastal shipping that would aid the displacement of Australian crews on the Australian coast with foreign crews doing the same work for reduced wages and conditions;* >> *(b) failed to outline its response to the High Court's decision to overturn the Government's attempt to circumvent Parliament's intention to give priority to Australian jobs in our offshore oil and gas sector;* >> *(c) actively worked to facilitate the replacement of Australian maritime crews by foreign crews for permanent work in Australia, by arranging rapid visas, skills recognition and access to ports in cases such as the MV Portland in January 2016; and* >> *(d) previously considered relaxing air cabotage arrangements that could have the effect of displacing Australian flight and cabin crews with foreign crews on lower wages and conditions while working in Australia; and* > *(4) notes that the Government and its expert agencies have repeatedly acknowledged the obvious point that criminal and security vetting of foreign aviation and maritime workers is much harder than for Australian workers; and* > *(5) calls on the Federal Government to develop
House of Representatives, 2017-02-13. negative: ayes 66, noes 76.
Question
The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2017-02-13.29.3) introduced by Labor MP [Anthony Albanese](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/grayndler/anthony_albanese), which means it failed. ### Motion text > *That all the words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > *"whilst not declining to give the Bill a [second reading](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html), the House:* > *(1) notes that the Government failed to articulate a policy for the aviation or maritime sectors at the 2016 Federal election;* > *(2) notes the Turnbull Government's failed WorkChoices On Water legislation would have seriously undermined the Australian maritime sector;* > *(3) notes in particular that the Government has:* >> *(a) failed to rule out further laws in coastal shipping that would aid the displacement of Australian crews on the Australian coast with foreign crews doing the same work for reduced wages and conditions;* >> *(b) failed to outline its response to the High Court's decision to overturn the Government's attempt to circumvent Parliament's intention to give priority to Australian jobs in our offshore oil and gas sector;* >> *(c) actively worked to facilitate the replacement of Australian maritime crews by foreign crews for permanent work in Australia, by arranging rapid visas, skills recognition and access to ports in cases such as the MV Portland in January 2016; and* >> *(d) previously considered relaxing air cabotage arrangements that could have the effect of displacing Australian flight and cabin crews with foreign crews on lower wages and conditions while working in Australia; and* > *(4) notes that the Government and its expert agencies have repeatedly acknowledged the obvious point that criminal and security vetting of foreign aviation and maritime workers is much harder than for Australian workers; and* > *(5) calls on the Federal Government to develop
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.