Division
Monique Ryan by leave—I move amendments (1) and (2) on sheet 2, as circulated in my name, together: (1) Clause 2, page 2 (table item 1), omit "Sections 1 to 3", substitute "Sections 1 to 4". (2) Page 3 (after line 8), after clause 3, insert: 4 Review of amendments (1) The Minister must cause a review to be conducted of the operation of the amendments made by this Act. (2) The review must be conducted at the same time as the review under section 4 of the _National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Getting the NDIS Back on Track No. 1) Act 2024_ of the operation of the amendments made by that Act. (3) The persons conducting the review must be independent of the Agency and of the Department. (4) The review must consider the following matters: (a) access to the NDIS; (b) participant outcomes, including continuity and quality of supports; (c) review and appeal rights under the _National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013_; (d) the viability and sustainability of the provider market; (e) service delivery in thin markets; (f) the interaction between the amendments made by this Act and any foundational supports or related systems of support. (5) The persons conducting the review must give the Minister a written report of the review. (6) The Minister must cause a copy of the report of the review to be tabled in each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after the Minister receives the report. This bill as currently drafted contains no mechanism for a review, no trigger for scrutiny and no obligation to return to this parliament and account for what these changes have delivered. I've moved these amendments today because that omission is not acceptable. The people that this legislation affects can't afford for us to pass reforms and then walk away. This bill could remove as many as 241,000 participants from the scheme. All of them deserve to know that the parliament will be required to look back, measure and answer for decisions that have been mad
House of Representatives, 2026-07-01. affirmative: ayes 101, noes 7.
Question
Monique Ryan by leave—I move amendments (1) and (2) on sheet 2, as circulated in my name, together: (1) Clause 2, page 2 (table item 1), omit "Sections 1 to 3", substitute "Sections 1 to 4". (2) Page 3 (after line 8), after clause 3, insert: 4 Review of amendments (1) The Minister must cause a review to be conducted of the operation of the amendments made by this Act. (2) The review must be conducted at the same time as the review under section 4 of the _National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Getting the NDIS Back on Track No. 1) Act 2024_ of the operation of the amendments made by that Act. (3) The persons conducting the review must be independent of the Agency and of the Department. (4) The review must consider the following matters: (a) access to the NDIS; (b) participant outcomes, including continuity and quality of supports; (c) review and appeal rights under the _National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013_; (d) the viability and sustainability of the provider market; (e) service delivery in thin markets; (f) the interaction between the amendments made by this Act and any foundational supports or related systems of support. (5) The persons conducting the review must give the Minister a written report of the review. (6) The Minister must cause a copy of the report of the review to be tabled in each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after the Minister receives the report. This bill as currently drafted contains no mechanism for a review, no trigger for scrutiny and no obligation to return to this parliament and account for what these changes have delivered. I've moved these amendments today because that omission is not acceptable. The people that this legislation affects can't afford for us to pass reforms and then walk away. This bill could remove as many as 241,000 participants from the scheme. All of them deserve to know that the parliament will be required to look back, measure and answer for decisions that have been mad
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.