Division
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2026-03-30.114.1) introduced by New England MP [Barnaby Joyce](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/new_england/barnaby_joyce) (Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party), which means it was unsuccessful. The amendment would have changed the text of the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). ### Amendment text > *That all words after "whilst" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House calls on the Government to initiate a review of this Bill for any potential areas of conflict with other legislation, including but not limited to the Safeguard Mechanism".*
House of Representatives, 2026-03-30. negative: ayes 43, noes 91.
Question
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2026-03-30.114.1) introduced by New England MP [Barnaby Joyce](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/new_england/barnaby_joyce) (Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party), which means it was unsuccessful. The amendment would have changed the text of the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). ### Amendment text > *That all words after "whilst" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House calls on the Government to initiate a review of this Bill for any potential areas of conflict with other legislation, including but not limited to the Safeguard Mechanism".*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.