Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2026-03-11.10.1) introduced by Kooyong MP [Monique Ryan](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/kooyong/monique_ryan) (Independent), which means they failed. Dr Ryan [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2026-03-11.10.1): > *This bill seeks to introduce significant changes to Australia's migration regime. It empowers the minister to suspend classes of temporary visas held by people offshore through so-called arrival control determinations. This is a sweeping power, one which could affect thousands of people who have already followed our migration rules in good faith and who have already obtained temporary visas in good faith. The amendments I have circulated in my name seek to strengthen the test for making these arrival control determinations to ensure that the minister will satisfy a higher and more proportionate threshold before exercising this extraordinary power. My amendments will ensure that determinations meet both limbs of the test under section 84B, ensuring that there is a reasonable probability that a controlled determination is actually necessary.* ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 6, page 4 (line 23), omit "one or".* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 6, page 4 (line 25), omit "may", substitute "would".* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 6, page 4 (line 31), omit "may", substitute "would".*
House of Representatives, 2026-03-11. negative: ayes 7, noes 84.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2026-03-11.10.1) introduced by Kooyong MP [Monique Ryan](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/kooyong/monique_ryan) (Independent), which means they failed. Dr Ryan [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2026-03-11.10.1): > *This bill seeks to introduce significant changes to Australia's migration regime. It empowers the minister to suspend classes of temporary visas held by people offshore through so-called arrival control determinations. This is a sweeping power, one which could affect thousands of people who have already followed our migration rules in good faith and who have already obtained temporary visas in good faith. The amendments I have circulated in my name seek to strengthen the test for making these arrival control determinations to ensure that the minister will satisfy a higher and more proportionate threshold before exercising this extraordinary power. My amendments will ensure that determinations meet both limbs of the test under section 84B, ensuring that there is a reasonable probability that a controlled determination is actually necessary.* ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 6, page 4 (line 23), omit "one or".* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 6, page 4 (line 25), omit "may", substitute "would".* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 6, page 4 (line 31), omit "may", substitute "would".*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.