Division
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2025-02-12.209.1) introduced by Queensland Senator [Pauline Hanson](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/pauline_hanson) (One Nation), which means it failed. It would have added the text below to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). ### Amendment text > *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:* > > *(a) notes that this legislation fails to make adequate provisions for the compensation of vulnerable Australians who have been victims of scams; and* > > *(b) calls on the Government to introduce legislation similar to the successful UK model of reimbursement, which ensures that banks are required to initially refund scam victims, providing stronger consumer protection and accountability in the financial sector".*
Senate, 2025-02-12. negative: ayes 18, noes 26.
Question
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2025-02-12.209.1) introduced by Queensland Senator [Pauline Hanson](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/pauline_hanson) (One Nation), which means it failed. It would have added the text below to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). ### Amendment text > *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:* > > *(a) notes that this legislation fails to make adequate provisions for the compensation of vulnerable Australians who have been victims of scams; and* > > *(b) calls on the Government to introduce legislation similar to the successful UK model of reimbursement, which ensures that banks are required to initially refund scam victims, providing stronger consumer protection and accountability in the financial sector".*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.