Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr7181_amend_b0a9b3b8-a1ee-43a1-98e5-2f42a92e31db%22;rec=0) introduced by ACT Senator [David Pocock](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/act/david_pocock) (Independent), which means they failed and will not be integrated into the bill. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 26, page 10 (line 7), at the end of subsection 28(2), add:* > >> *; and (c) the impairments in respect of which the participant meets the disability requirements or the early intervention requirements (as the case requires).* > > *(1A) Schedule 1, item 31, page 13 (after line 29), after subsection 30A(5A), insert:* > >> *(5B) The Agency must pay the participant an amount equal to any cost paid by the participant for an assessment or examination mentioned in subsection (5).* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 31, page 14 (line 11), omit "the CEO must", substitute "the CEO may".* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 36, page 18 (after line 5), after paragraph 32D(2)(c), insert:* > >> *(ca) the impairments in respect of which the participant meets the disability requirements or the early intervention requirements (as the case requires); and* > > *(4) Schedule 1, item 36, page 23 (lines 14 to 15), omit paragraph 32F(7)(b), substitute:* > >> *(b) there has been significant, intentional or repeated non-compliance with section 46 (acquittal of NDIS amounts) in relation to the plan or any of the participant's previous plans;* > > *(5) Schedule 1, item 36, page 25 (after line 14), after subsection 32H(1), insert:* > >> *(1A) However, such a requirement may only be specified if:* >> >>> *(a) the requirement is reasonably necessary to achieve a specific purpose consistent with the objects of the National Disability Insurance Scheme; and* >>> >>> *(b) to do so would not be unduly burdensome for the participant, after considering:* >>> >>>
Senate, 2024-08-22. negative: ayes 13, noes 30.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr7181_amend_b0a9b3b8-a1ee-43a1-98e5-2f42a92e31db%22;rec=0) introduced by ACT Senator [David Pocock](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/act/david_pocock) (Independent), which means they failed and will not be integrated into the bill. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 26, page 10 (line 7), at the end of subsection 28(2), add:* > >> *; and (c) the impairments in respect of which the participant meets the disability requirements or the early intervention requirements (as the case requires).* > > *(1A) Schedule 1, item 31, page 13 (after line 29), after subsection 30A(5A), insert:* > >> *(5B) The Agency must pay the participant an amount equal to any cost paid by the participant for an assessment or examination mentioned in subsection (5).* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 31, page 14 (line 11), omit "the CEO must", substitute "the CEO may".* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 36, page 18 (after line 5), after paragraph 32D(2)(c), insert:* > >> *(ca) the impairments in respect of which the participant meets the disability requirements or the early intervention requirements (as the case requires); and* > > *(4) Schedule 1, item 36, page 23 (lines 14 to 15), omit paragraph 32F(7)(b), substitute:* > >> *(b) there has been significant, intentional or repeated non-compliance with section 46 (acquittal of NDIS amounts) in relation to the plan or any of the participant's previous plans;* > > *(5) Schedule 1, item 36, page 25 (after line 14), after subsection 32H(1), insert:* > >> *(1A) However, such a requirement may only be specified if:* >> >>> *(a) the requirement is reasonably necessary to achieve a specific purpose consistent with the objects of the National Disability Insurance Scheme; and* >>> >>> *(b) to do so would not be unduly burdensome for the participant, after considering:* >>> >>>
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.