Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2024-03-27.207.1) introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Nick McKim](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/nick_mckim) (Greens), which means they failed. The amendments related to solar PV systems and would have extended the period of the instant asset write-off and the small business energy incentive. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 1, page 4 (line 6), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 2, page 4 (line 9), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 4, page 4 (line 18), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(4) Schedule 1, item 4, page 4 (line 21), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(5) Schedule 1, item 5, page 4 (line 27), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(6) Schedule 1, item 6, page 5 (line 4), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(7) Schedule 2, item 1, page 6 (line 14), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(8) Schedule 2, item 1, page 7 (line 6), omit "1 July 2024", substitute "1 July 2026".* > > *(9) Schedule 2, item 1, page 7 (line 11), omit "1 July 2024", substitute "1 July 2026".* > > *(10) Schedule 2, item 1, page 7 (line 21), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(11) Schedule 2, item 1, page 8 (line 28), omit "1 July 2024", substitute "1 July 2026".* > > *(12) Schedule 2, item 1, page 9 (line 14), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(13) Schedule 2, item 1, page 10 (line 20), omit "(for example, photovoltaic cells)".* > > *(14) Schedule 2, item 1, page 10 (after line 32), at the end of section 328-470, add:* > >> *(7) Despite subsection (6):* >> >>> *(a) an asset that is a solar photovoltaic system that is part of a package of energy upgrades is not excluded by that subsection; and* >>> >>> *(b) expenditure on such an asset is not excluded by that subsection.*
Senate, 2024-03-27. negative: ayes 17, noes 20.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2024-03-27.207.1) introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Nick McKim](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/nick_mckim) (Greens), which means they failed. The amendments related to solar PV systems and would have extended the period of the instant asset write-off and the small business energy incentive. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 1, page 4 (line 6), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 2, page 4 (line 9), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 4, page 4 (line 18), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(4) Schedule 1, item 4, page 4 (line 21), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(5) Schedule 1, item 5, page 4 (line 27), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(6) Schedule 1, item 6, page 5 (line 4), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(7) Schedule 2, item 1, page 6 (line 14), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(8) Schedule 2, item 1, page 7 (line 6), omit "1 July 2024", substitute "1 July 2026".* > > *(9) Schedule 2, item 1, page 7 (line 11), omit "1 July 2024", substitute "1 July 2026".* > > *(10) Schedule 2, item 1, page 7 (line 21), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(11) Schedule 2, item 1, page 8 (line 28), omit "1 July 2024", substitute "1 July 2026".* > > *(12) Schedule 2, item 1, page 9 (line 14), omit "30 June 2024", substitute "30 June 2026".* > > *(13) Schedule 2, item 1, page 10 (line 20), omit "(for example, photovoltaic cells)".* > > *(14) Schedule 2, item 1, page 10 (after line 32), at the end of section 328-470, add:* > >> *(7) Despite subsection (6):* >> >>> *(a) an asset that is a solar photovoltaic system that is part of a package of energy upgrades is not excluded by that subsection; and* >>> >>> *(b) expenditure on such an asset is not excluded by that subsection.*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.