Division
The majority voted against [requests for amendments and an amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-11-17.60.1) introduced by Victorian Senator [Janet Rice](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/victoria/janet_rice) (Greens). ### What is the purpose of these amendments? Senator Rice [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-11-17.60.1): > *These amendments relate to improving the accessibility to and improving the rate of the disability support pension, which are critical and central to meeting the objective of this act to achieve the economic and social inclusion of people with disabilities. As I noted in my second reading speech, the Senate community affairs committee did a very comprehensive inquiry into the adequacy of the disability support pension a couple of years back. That committee made some consensus recommendations, but we have not had a response from government on those recommendations, which is pretty upsetting given how much work went into that committee report and the input that we had from people with disabilities. As I said, the recommendations we came up with had cross-party support. What these amendments seek to do is to implement some of those recommendations. [...]* > > *These amendments would raise the base rate of the Disability Support Pension. They would increase the income-free area for people under 21, make the program of support voluntary and remove the requirement that a condition be diagnosed, reasonably treated and stabilised. Our amendments go further than any recent reforms to the payment, and are an absolutely critical step to improving the accessibility, the inclusivity and the adequacy of the payment.*
Senate, 2023-11-17. negative: ayes 12, noes 20.
Question
The majority voted against [requests for amendments and an amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-11-17.60.1) introduced by Victorian Senator [Janet Rice](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/victoria/janet_rice) (Greens). ### What is the purpose of these amendments? Senator Rice [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-11-17.60.1): > *These amendments relate to improving the accessibility to and improving the rate of the disability support pension, which are critical and central to meeting the objective of this act to achieve the economic and social inclusion of people with disabilities. As I noted in my second reading speech, the Senate community affairs committee did a very comprehensive inquiry into the adequacy of the disability support pension a couple of years back. That committee made some consensus recommendations, but we have not had a response from government on those recommendations, which is pretty upsetting given how much work went into that committee report and the input that we had from people with disabilities. As I said, the recommendations we came up with had cross-party support. What these amendments seek to do is to implement some of those recommendations. [...]* > > *These amendments would raise the base rate of the Disability Support Pension. They would increase the income-free area for people under 21, make the program of support voluntary and remove the requirement that a condition be diagnosed, reasonably treated and stabilised. Our amendments go further than any recent reforms to the payment, and are an absolutely critical step to improving the accessibility, the inclusivity and the adequacy of the payment.*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.