Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-11-09.57.1) introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Peter Whish-Wilson](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/peter_whish-wilson), which means they failed. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, page 4 (before line 4), before item 1, insert:* > >> *1A Subsection 4(1)* >> >> *Insert:* >> >>> *applicable risk framework and guidelines means the following:* >>> >>> *(a) the Risk assessment and management framework for CO2 sequestration in sub-seabed geological structures, in Annex 3 to Resolution LC/SG-CO2 1/7 adopted on 3 November 2006 by the Contracting Parties to the Protocol;* >>> >>> *(b) the Specific guidelines for the assessment of carbon dioxide for disposal into sub-seabed geological formations, in Annex 8 to Resolution LC 34/15 adopted on 2 November 2012 by the Contracting Parties to the Protocol.* >>> >>> *Note: These documents could in 2023 be viewed on the International Maritime Organization's website (https:// www.imo.org/en/).* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 3, page 5 (after line 15), after paragraph 19(7B)(d), insert:* > >> *(da) that there is an agreement or arrangement in force:* >> >>> *(i) between the Commonwealth and each entity that is proposing to export the controlled material; and* >>> >>> *(ii) under which each of those entities agrees to comply with the applicable risk framework and guidelines; and* >>> >>> *(db) that the other country to which the export relates has equal or better standards of environmental management, regulation and enforcement as compared to Australia;* > > *(3) Schedule 1, page 5 (after line 16), after item 3, insert:* > >> *3A After section 21* >> >> *Insert:* >> >>> *22 Conditions imposed by this section in respect of permits for the export of controlled material* >>> >>> *(1) This section applies for each permit for the export of controlled material from Australia to another country for dumping.* >>> >>> *(2) A condition imposed
Senate, 2023-11-13. negative: ayes 12, noes 25.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-11-09.57.1) introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Peter Whish-Wilson](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/peter_whish-wilson), which means they failed. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, page 4 (before line 4), before item 1, insert:* > >> *1A Subsection 4(1)* >> >> *Insert:* >> >>> *applicable risk framework and guidelines means the following:* >>> >>> *(a) the Risk assessment and management framework for CO2 sequestration in sub-seabed geological structures, in Annex 3 to Resolution LC/SG-CO2 1/7 adopted on 3 November 2006 by the Contracting Parties to the Protocol;* >>> >>> *(b) the Specific guidelines for the assessment of carbon dioxide for disposal into sub-seabed geological formations, in Annex 8 to Resolution LC 34/15 adopted on 2 November 2012 by the Contracting Parties to the Protocol.* >>> >>> *Note: These documents could in 2023 be viewed on the International Maritime Organization's website (https:// www.imo.org/en/).* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 3, page 5 (after line 15), after paragraph 19(7B)(d), insert:* > >> *(da) that there is an agreement or arrangement in force:* >> >>> *(i) between the Commonwealth and each entity that is proposing to export the controlled material; and* >>> >>> *(ii) under which each of those entities agrees to comply with the applicable risk framework and guidelines; and* >>> >>> *(db) that the other country to which the export relates has equal or better standards of environmental management, regulation and enforcement as compared to Australia;* > > *(3) Schedule 1, page 5 (after line 16), after item 3, insert:* > >> *3A After section 21* >> >> *Insert:* >> >>> *22 Conditions imposed by this section in respect of permits for the export of controlled material* >>> >>> *(1) This section applies for each permit for the export of controlled material from Australia to another country for dumping.* >>> >>> *(2) A condition imposed
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.