Division
The No votes succeeded in rejecting amendments proposed by Greens [Senator Wright](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Penny_Wright&mpc=Senate&house=senatein). This vote means that the amendments will not be included in the legislation. Someone who votes aye for this amendment supports these measures. The majority voted no for this amendment so it was unsuccessful. **Summary of amendments** Two amendments were proposed. The [first](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/amend/r4945_amend_8ff5e077-f708-4fc1-8b1b-df544a3658ac/upload_pdf/7410_Australian%20Education%20Bill%202013_AG.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf#search=%22legislation/amend/r4945_amend_8ff5e077-f708-4fc1-8b1b-df544a3658ac%22) proposes that schools apply with anti-discrimination laws. The [second](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/amend/r4945_amend_62e58efd-d663-4e43-9939-57f9a5c565f0/upload_pdf/7409_Australian%20Education%20Bill%202013_AG.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf#search=%22legislation/amend/r4945_amend_62e58efd-d663-4e43-9939-57f9a5c565f0%22) includes such proposals as schools reporting about their financial assistance. **Background to Bill** This Bill was developed in response to the [Review of Funding for Schooling](http://foi.deewr.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/review-of-funding-for-schooling-final-report-dec-2011.pdf), commissioned by [David Gonski](http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-27/whats-in-the-gonski-report/4219508) (known as the 'Gonski Review'). The Report explored the issue of the decline of performance in Australian school children over the past 10 years and the gap between the highest and lowest performing students. The Report found that the current funding model for Australian schools was unnecessarily complex and proposed a new funding system. As an alternative, a new funding model was proposed. This included a base 'per student' fee that is to be set for a student at any school. Additional loadings would be pa
Senate, 2013-06-26. negative: ayes 9, noes 56.
Question
The No votes succeeded in rejecting amendments proposed by Greens [Senator Wright](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Penny_Wright&mpc=Senate&house=senatein). This vote means that the amendments will not be included in the legislation. Someone who votes aye for this amendment supports these measures. The majority voted no for this amendment so it was unsuccessful. **Summary of amendments** Two amendments were proposed. The [first](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/amend/r4945_amend_8ff5e077-f708-4fc1-8b1b-df544a3658ac/upload_pdf/7410_Australian%20Education%20Bill%202013_AG.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf#search=%22legislation/amend/r4945_amend_8ff5e077-f708-4fc1-8b1b-df544a3658ac%22) proposes that schools apply with anti-discrimination laws. The [second](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/amend/r4945_amend_62e58efd-d663-4e43-9939-57f9a5c565f0/upload_pdf/7409_Australian%20Education%20Bill%202013_AG.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf#search=%22legislation/amend/r4945_amend_62e58efd-d663-4e43-9939-57f9a5c565f0%22) includes such proposals as schools reporting about their financial assistance. **Background to Bill** This Bill was developed in response to the [Review of Funding for Schooling](http://foi.deewr.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/review-of-funding-for-schooling-final-report-dec-2011.pdf), commissioned by [David Gonski](http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-27/whats-in-the-gonski-report/4219508) (known as the 'Gonski Review'). The Report explored the issue of the decline of performance in Australian school children over the past 10 years and the gap between the highest and lowest performing students. The Report found that the current funding model for Australian schools was unnecessarily complex and proposed a new funding system. As an alternative, a new funding model was proposed. This included a base 'per student' fee that is to be set for a student at any school. Additional loadings would be pa
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.