Skip to content

Menu

Division

The majority voted against [a request for amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2026-04-01.17.1) introduced by ACT Senator [David Pocock](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/act/david_pocock) (Independent), which means it was unsuccessful. This request would have added a schedule to increase, index and review the remote area allowance. ### What is the purpose of this request? Dr Francis Markham of the ANU has written a [policy brief](https://policybrief.anu.edu.au/the-poor-pay-more-why-the-remote-area-allowance-needs-urgent-reform/) that presents an argument why the remote area allowance needs to be increased, as suggested by this request for amendment.

Senate, 2026-04-01. negative: ayes 17, noes 29.

Question

The majority voted against [a request for amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2026-04-01.17.1) introduced by ACT Senator [David Pocock](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/act/david_pocock) (Independent), which means it was unsuccessful. This request would have added a schedule to increase, index and review the remote area allowance. ### What is the purpose of this request? Dr Francis Markham of the ANU has written a [policy brief](https://policybrief.anu.edu.au/the-poor-pay-more-why-the-remote-area-allowance-needs-urgent-reform/) that presents an argument why the remote area allowance needs to be increased, as suggested by this request for amendment.

View original

How each member voted

Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.

Related bills

Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.