Division
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr7456_amend_8a68fb97-c4c9-4976-adec-df30f2f30977%22;rec=0) introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Nick McKim](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/nick_mckim) (Greens), which means it was unsuccessful. ### Amendment text > *Page 6 (after line 9), at the end of the Bill, add:* > > *Schedule 2 — Price gouging* > > *Competition and Consumer Act 2010* > > *1 Subsection 4(1)* > >> *Insert:* >> >>> *competitive price has the meaning given by subsection 46(2B).* > > *2 Before subsection 46(1)* > >> *Insert:* >> >>> *Substantially lessening competition* > > *3 After subsection 46(1)* > >> *Insert:* >> >>> *Price gouging* >>> >>> *(2) A corporation that has a substantial degree of power in a market must not engage in conduct that results, or is likely to result, in:* >>> >>>> *(a) a good or service being acquired by another person, or supplied to another person, at a price that is excessive; or* >>>> >>>> *(b) an offer being made to another person for the other person to acquire a good or service, or for the other person to be supplied a good or service, at a price that is excessive; or* >>>> >>>> *(c) an agreement being entered into by another person for the other person to acquire a good or service, or for the other person to be supplied a good or service, at a price that is excessive.* >>> >>> *(2A) For the purposes of subsection (2), in determining whether a price for the acquisition or supply of a good or service is excessive, regard must be had to the competitive price for the good or service.* >>> >>> *(2B) The competitive price , for a good or service, is the price at which the good or service would have been acquired by, or supplied to, the other person if the corporation did not have a substantial degree of power in that market.* >>> >>> *(2C) Subsection (2) does not apply i
Senate, 2026-03-26. negative: ayes 11, noes 26.
Question
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr7456_amend_8a68fb97-c4c9-4976-adec-df30f2f30977%22;rec=0) introduced by Tasmanian Senator [Nick McKim](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/nick_mckim) (Greens), which means it was unsuccessful. ### Amendment text > *Page 6 (after line 9), at the end of the Bill, add:* > > *Schedule 2 — Price gouging* > > *Competition and Consumer Act 2010* > > *1 Subsection 4(1)* > >> *Insert:* >> >>> *competitive price has the meaning given by subsection 46(2B).* > > *2 Before subsection 46(1)* > >> *Insert:* >> >>> *Substantially lessening competition* > > *3 After subsection 46(1)* > >> *Insert:* >> >>> *Price gouging* >>> >>> *(2) A corporation that has a substantial degree of power in a market must not engage in conduct that results, or is likely to result, in:* >>> >>>> *(a) a good or service being acquired by another person, or supplied to another person, at a price that is excessive; or* >>>> >>>> *(b) an offer being made to another person for the other person to acquire a good or service, or for the other person to be supplied a good or service, at a price that is excessive; or* >>>> >>>> *(c) an agreement being entered into by another person for the other person to acquire a good or service, or for the other person to be supplied a good or service, at a price that is excessive.* >>> >>> *(2A) For the purposes of subsection (2), in determining whether a price for the acquisition or supply of a good or service is excessive, regard must be had to the competitive price for the good or service.* >>> >>> *(2B) The competitive price , for a good or service, is the price at which the good or service would have been acquired by, or supplied to, the other person if the corporation did not have a substantial degree of power in that market.* >>> >>> *(2C) Subsection (2) does not apply i
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.