Division
Katy Gallagher I move: That this bill be now read a second time. I seek leave to have the second reading speech incorporated in _Hansard_. Leave granted. _The speech read as follows—_ Today, I introduce the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026. This bill amends the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 to double maximum penalties for misconduct under competition law and the Australian Consumer Law, from $50 million to $100 million. These laws help tackle price gouging at its source, outlawing: The even stronger penalties we are introducing will empower the ACCC to throw the book at any companies who illegally and unfairly increase their prices. Since the start of the war, we have seen much higher prices for petrol and diesel across the country. It has put more pressure on motorists and families already doing it tough. Our message to petrol retailers has been clear: you are on notice; do not use the conflict to take advantage of Australians. Now they'll face penalties up to $100 million per offence if they do. These penalties apply across the economy. This will help ensure all retailers and suppliers, from fuel companies to supermarkets and the entire supply chain in between, do not use the war in the Middle East as an excuse for illegal and unfair pricing. The states and territories share the Albanese government's sense of urgency. Reforms to the Australian Consumer Law require agreement of the states and territories, and I want to thank every one of them for swiftly confirming their agreement to support these reforms. The ACCC has been clear they won't hesitate to take action to protect consumers and markets, and they'll seek the highest penalties appropriate in any case they take to court. This bill is an important way we are protecting consumers and securing Australia's fuel security, but it's not the only way. We have already: The bill also brings Australia's competition law penalties into closer alignment with comparable econo
Senate, 2026-03-26. negative: ayes 10, noes 25.
Question
Katy Gallagher I move: That this bill be now read a second time. I seek leave to have the second reading speech incorporated in _Hansard_. Leave granted. _The speech read as follows—_ Today, I introduce the Treasury Laws Amendment (Doubling Penalties for ACCC Enforcement) Bill 2026. This bill amends the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 to double maximum penalties for misconduct under competition law and the Australian Consumer Law, from $50 million to $100 million. These laws help tackle price gouging at its source, outlawing: The even stronger penalties we are introducing will empower the ACCC to throw the book at any companies who illegally and unfairly increase their prices. Since the start of the war, we have seen much higher prices for petrol and diesel across the country. It has put more pressure on motorists and families already doing it tough. Our message to petrol retailers has been clear: you are on notice; do not use the conflict to take advantage of Australians. Now they'll face penalties up to $100 million per offence if they do. These penalties apply across the economy. This will help ensure all retailers and suppliers, from fuel companies to supermarkets and the entire supply chain in between, do not use the war in the Middle East as an excuse for illegal and unfair pricing. The states and territories share the Albanese government's sense of urgency. Reforms to the Australian Consumer Law require agreement of the states and territories, and I want to thank every one of them for swiftly confirming their agreement to support these reforms. The ACCC has been clear they won't hesitate to take action to protect consumers and markets, and they'll seek the highest penalties appropriate in any case they take to court. This bill is an important way we are protecting consumers and securing Australia's fuel security, but it's not the only way. We have already: The bill also brings Australia's competition law penalties into closer alignment with comparable econo
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.