Division
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2026-03-25.27.1) introduced by Queensland Senator [Larissa Waters](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/larissa_waters) (Greens), which means it was unsuccessful.. ### What does this amendment do? Senator Waters [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2026-03-25.27.1): > *This amendment would require the government to actually respond to the recommendations of the commissioner that this bill is establishing as an independent statutory position. The bill allows the commissioner to seek information from governments to inform her reports and recommendations, but there is nothing in the bill to compel the government to actually respond to those recommendations. I think that is tragic and I think it is very easily fixed. The optimist in me thought it was an oversight; however, it seems to be by design, and I think that is heartbreaking. On a day when we are doing a good thing, to establish a commissioner to look into the needs of First Nations young kids, why the backhand to say, 'Yeah, but we're not actually going to be compelled to respond to your recommendations'?* ### Amendment text > *(1) Clause 16, page 13 (after line 19), at the end of the clause, add:* > >> *Government response* >> >> *(4) If a report given to the Minister under subsection (2) sets out one or more recommendations to the Commonwealth Government:* >> >>> *(a) as soon as practicable after receiving the report, the Minister must cause to be prepared a statement setting out:* >>> >>>> *(i) the Commonwealth Government's response to each of the recommendations; and* >>>> >>>> *(ii) if the Commonwealth Government has not accepted a recommendation—the reasons for not accepting the recommendation; and* >>> >>> *(b) the Minister must cause copies of the statement to be tabled in each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after the report is given to the Minist
Senate, 2026-03-25. negative: ayes 14, noes 29.
Question
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2026-03-25.27.1) introduced by Queensland Senator [Larissa Waters](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/larissa_waters) (Greens), which means it was unsuccessful.. ### What does this amendment do? Senator Waters [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2026-03-25.27.1): > *This amendment would require the government to actually respond to the recommendations of the commissioner that this bill is establishing as an independent statutory position. The bill allows the commissioner to seek information from governments to inform her reports and recommendations, but there is nothing in the bill to compel the government to actually respond to those recommendations. I think that is tragic and I think it is very easily fixed. The optimist in me thought it was an oversight; however, it seems to be by design, and I think that is heartbreaking. On a day when we are doing a good thing, to establish a commissioner to look into the needs of First Nations young kids, why the backhand to say, 'Yeah, but we're not actually going to be compelled to respond to your recommendations'?* ### Amendment text > *(1) Clause 16, page 13 (after line 19), at the end of the clause, add:* > >> *Government response* >> >> *(4) If a report given to the Minister under subsection (2) sets out one or more recommendations to the Commonwealth Government:* >> >>> *(a) as soon as practicable after receiving the report, the Minister must cause to be prepared a statement setting out:* >>> >>>> *(i) the Commonwealth Government's response to each of the recommendations; and* >>>> >>>> *(ii) if the Commonwealth Government has not accepted a recommendation—the reasons for not accepting the recommendation; and* >>> >>> *(b) the Minister must cause copies of the statement to be tabled in each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after the report is given to the Minist
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.