Division
The majority voted in favour of a [government amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2024-11-07.44.1) to remove the subclauses set out below, which means those subclauses will no longer be part of the bill. ### Amendment text > *(1) Clause 158, page 167 (line 26) to page 168 (line 18), omit subclauses (5) to (7).* ### Subclauses (5) to (7) > *158 Advisory body requirements* > > *[...]* > > *(5) It is a condition of registration that a registered provider of a kind prescribed by the rules must offer, in accordance with any requirements prescribed by the rules, aged care workers of the provider the opportunity to establish a body (the quality care worker voice body ) to:* > >> *(a) give responsible persons of the provider feedback about the quality of the funded aged care services delivered by the provider; and* >> >> *(b) give responsible persons of the provider feedback on any other matters prescribed by the rules; and* >> >> *(c) work collaboratively with the responsible persons and governing body of the provider to address any such feedback.* >> >> *Note: A person may make a complaint to the Complaints Commissioner about compliance with this Act: see section 361.* > > *(6) If a quality care worker voice body is established, a registered provider must require the governing body of the provider to:* > >> *(a) comply with any requirements regarding membership of the body and the terms and conditions of members of the body prescribed by the rules; and* >> >> *(b) consider feedback given by the body when making decisions in relation to the quality of the funded aged care services delivered by the provider; and* >> >> *(c) advise, in writing, the body how the governing body considered such feedback.* > > *(7) It is a condition of registration that the registered provider must, if requested to do so by a quality care worker voice body, give the body information about the quality of the funded aged care services delivered by the provider.*
House of Representatives, 2024-11-07. affirmative: ayes 51, noes 8.
Question
The majority voted in favour of a [government amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2024-11-07.44.1) to remove the subclauses set out below, which means those subclauses will no longer be part of the bill. ### Amendment text > *(1) Clause 158, page 167 (line 26) to page 168 (line 18), omit subclauses (5) to (7).* ### Subclauses (5) to (7) > *158 Advisory body requirements* > > *[...]* > > *(5) It is a condition of registration that a registered provider of a kind prescribed by the rules must offer, in accordance with any requirements prescribed by the rules, aged care workers of the provider the opportunity to establish a body (the quality care worker voice body ) to:* > >> *(a) give responsible persons of the provider feedback about the quality of the funded aged care services delivered by the provider; and* >> >> *(b) give responsible persons of the provider feedback on any other matters prescribed by the rules; and* >> >> *(c) work collaboratively with the responsible persons and governing body of the provider to address any such feedback.* >> >> *Note: A person may make a complaint to the Complaints Commissioner about compliance with this Act: see section 361.* > > *(6) If a quality care worker voice body is established, a registered provider must require the governing body of the provider to:* > >> *(a) comply with any requirements regarding membership of the body and the terms and conditions of members of the body prescribed by the rules; and* >> >> *(b) consider feedback given by the body when making decisions in relation to the quality of the funded aged care services delivered by the provider; and* >> >> *(c) advise, in writing, the body how the governing body considered such feedback.* > > *(7) It is a condition of registration that the registered provider must, if requested to do so by a quality care worker voice body, give the body information about the quality of the funded aged care services delivered by the provider.*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.