Division
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2024-08-13.93.1) introduced by North Sydney MP [Kylea Tink](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/north_sydney/kylea_tink), which means it failed. Ms Tink [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2024-08-13.93.1): > *The amendment I'm moving seeks to remove the ministerial power to set caps at the course level, instead allowing for caps at the provider level only. The reason I believe this amendment is required is that ministerial intervention at the course level is a dangerous overreach that would have serious consequences for institutional autonomy, existing regulations and student choice.* ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 45, page 23 (lines 6 to 10), omit the definition of course enrolment limit in section 5.* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 46, page 23 (lines 16 to 26), omit the item, substitute:* > >> *46 Section 15A (after the paragraph beginning "Division 1 contains")* >> >>> *Insert:* >>> >>>> *The Minister may determine under Division 1AA a limit (called the total enrolment limit) on the number of overseas students that may be enrolled in all courses provided by a provider in a year. A provider must not exceed its total enrolment limit for a year.* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 47, page 29 (line 11) to page 34 (line 8), omit Subdivision C.* > > *(4) Schedule 1, item 48, page 34 (lines 9 to 18), omit the item, substitute:* >> >> *48 Section 83A (after the paragraph beginning "The ESOS agency")* >> >>> *Insert:* >>> >>>> *Division 1AA provides for automatic suspension of a provider’s registration for all courses in relation to a year if the provider exceeds its total enrolment limit for the year.* > > *(5) Schedule 1, item 49, page 36 (line 4) to page 37 (line 20), omit section 96A.* > > *(6) Schedule 1, item 50, page 37 (table item 13), omit the table item.* > > *(7) Schedule 1, item 51, page 38 (line 5), omit "or 96A(6)".* > > *(8) Sche
House of Representatives, 2024-08-13. negative: ayes 14, noes 46.
Question
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2024-08-13.93.1) introduced by North Sydney MP [Kylea Tink](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/north_sydney/kylea_tink), which means it failed. Ms Tink [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2024-08-13.93.1): > *The amendment I'm moving seeks to remove the ministerial power to set caps at the course level, instead allowing for caps at the provider level only. The reason I believe this amendment is required is that ministerial intervention at the course level is a dangerous overreach that would have serious consequences for institutional autonomy, existing regulations and student choice.* ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 45, page 23 (lines 6 to 10), omit the definition of course enrolment limit in section 5.* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 46, page 23 (lines 16 to 26), omit the item, substitute:* > >> *46 Section 15A (after the paragraph beginning "Division 1 contains")* >> >>> *Insert:* >>> >>>> *The Minister may determine under Division 1AA a limit (called the total enrolment limit) on the number of overseas students that may be enrolled in all courses provided by a provider in a year. A provider must not exceed its total enrolment limit for a year.* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 47, page 29 (line 11) to page 34 (line 8), omit Subdivision C.* > > *(4) Schedule 1, item 48, page 34 (lines 9 to 18), omit the item, substitute:* >> >> *48 Section 83A (after the paragraph beginning "The ESOS agency")* >> >>> *Insert:* >>> >>>> *Division 1AA provides for automatic suspension of a provider’s registration for all courses in relation to a year if the provider exceeds its total enrolment limit for the year.* > > *(5) Schedule 1, item 49, page 36 (line 4) to page 37 (line 20), omit section 96A.* > > *(6) Schedule 1, item 50, page 37 (table item 13), omit the table item.* > > *(7) Schedule 1, item 51, page 38 (line 5), omit "or 96A(6)".* > > *(8) Sche
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.