Division
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr7107_amend_ef27ac47-7b3a-472b-9fb9-22c918506104%22;rec=0) to [another amendment](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/divisions/representatives/2024-03-18/3) introduced by Warringah MP [Zali Steggall](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/warringah/zali_steggall) (Independent). The amendment was introduced by Indi MP [Helen Haines](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/indi/helen_haines) (Independent). ### Amendment text > *That all words after “acknowledging the” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *“House does not decline to give the bill a second reading, it:* > > *(1) notes that the bill has two important, and distinctly unrelated purposes, being to:* > >> *(a) implement a response to the PwC tax leaks scandal, which was an outrageous breach of confidentiality by a consultancy hired by Government; and* >> >> *(b) reform the Petroleum Resources Rent Tax, by establishing a cap on the use of deductions by offshore gas and oil projects; and* > > *(2) notes that the illogical merging of two unrelated, yet equally important issues into the same piece of legislation is not consistent with the principles of good governance; and* > > *(3) calls on the Government to separate out the provisions of the Petroleum Resources Rent Tax changes from the PwC response provisions, so that they may be considered, debated and voted on in isolation on their individual merits”.* ### Steggall's amendment text > *That all words after “acknowledging” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *“the role of gas companies in influencing the drafting of this bill, the House declines to give the bill a second reading as it is of the opinion that:* > > *(1) the bill should:* > >> *(a) adopt an 80 per cent deductions cap for the Petroleum Re
House of Representatives, 2024-03-18. negative: ayes 16, noes 55.
Question
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr7107_amend_ef27ac47-7b3a-472b-9fb9-22c918506104%22;rec=0) to [another amendment](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/divisions/representatives/2024-03-18/3) introduced by Warringah MP [Zali Steggall](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/warringah/zali_steggall) (Independent). The amendment was introduced by Indi MP [Helen Haines](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/indi/helen_haines) (Independent). ### Amendment text > *That all words after “acknowledging the” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *“House does not decline to give the bill a second reading, it:* > > *(1) notes that the bill has two important, and distinctly unrelated purposes, being to:* > >> *(a) implement a response to the PwC tax leaks scandal, which was an outrageous breach of confidentiality by a consultancy hired by Government; and* >> >> *(b) reform the Petroleum Resources Rent Tax, by establishing a cap on the use of deductions by offshore gas and oil projects; and* > > *(2) notes that the illogical merging of two unrelated, yet equally important issues into the same piece of legislation is not consistent with the principles of good governance; and* > > *(3) calls on the Government to separate out the provisions of the Petroleum Resources Rent Tax changes from the PwC response provisions, so that they may be considered, debated and voted on in isolation on their individual merits”.* ### Steggall's amendment text > *That all words after “acknowledging” be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *“the role of gas companies in influencing the drafting of this bill, the House declines to give the bill a second reading as it is of the opinion that:* > > *(1) the bill should:* > >> *(a) adopt an 80 per cent deductions cap for the Petroleum Re
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.