Division
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2023-10-18.190.1) to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*", which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. This amendment was introduced by Griffith MP [Max Chandler-Mather](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/griffith/max_chandler-mather) (Greens). ### Amendment text > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"the House declines to give the bill a second reading until the Privacy Act reforms are in place in recognition of the significant privacy and data implications of this proposal".*
House of Representatives, 2023-10-18. negative: ayes 5, noes 65.
Question
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2023-10-18.190.1) to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*", which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. This amendment was introduced by Griffith MP [Max Chandler-Mather](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/griffith/max_chandler-mather) (Greens). ### Amendment text > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"the House declines to give the bill a second reading until the Privacy Act reforms are in place in recognition of the significant privacy and data implications of this proposal".*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.