Report on Corrupt Procurement Practices of a Senior Officer at the Shire of East Pilbara
- Opinions
- 1
- Recommendations
- 1
- Report length
- 43 pages
Summary
The report's own summary: THE INVESTIGATION, pages 3 to 14
Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.
The Corruption and Crime Commission investigated whether an operations manager at the Shire of East Pilbara used his position corruptly to benefit himself or others.
The Commission found that the manager favoured contractors and received gifts in exchange for allocating work.
The Commission formed an opinion of serious misconduct and identified ineffective oversight and insufficient separation of purchasing and payment functions.
20261001 Report on Corrupt Procurement Practices of a Senior Officer at the Shire of East Pilbara, page 11 · 20261001 Report on Corrupt Procurement Practices of a Senior Officer at the Shire of East Pilbara, page 13
The Commission made one recommendation to review the Shire’s procurement procedures, including approvals, compliance, completed work and reporting.
Opinions 1
Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.
opinion of serious misconduct
OpinionThe Commission formed an opinion of serious misconduct by Mr Klein under s 4(b) of the CCM Act.
Recommendations 1
Recommendation
The Commission acknowledges Mr Harding's evidence regarding the changes that have been made to SOEP's procurement procedures. Nevertheless, the Commission recommends that the Shire engages its internal auditor or other consultant to undertake a complete review of its procedures. The focus of the review should be on ensuring that: (a) There is a separation of functions between issuing purchase orders and authorising payment of invoices; (b) There is compliance with the policies relating to request for quotes, tenders and multiple quotations and there are processes in place to check compliance; (c) The changes that have been made to monitor the use of delegated authorities by directors and managers are sufficient; (d) There is an effective process for ensuring that contracted work has been satisfactorily completed before payment or progress claims are processed; (e) Decisions made by management about works and projects to be undertaken are properly documented; (f) Meetings between the CEO, directors and managers are regularly programmed and the outcomes recorded; (g) There are appropriate reporting processes for management, SOEP’s Audit, Risk and Governance Committee and the Council.
Published responses
No published response was found.
Official documents 2
20261001 Report on Corrupt Procurement Practices of a Senior Officer at the Shire of East Pilbara
Document details
- Role
- Report
20261001 Media Release - Report on Corrupt Procurement Practices of a Senior Officer at the Shire of East Pilbara
Document details
- Status
- Linked
- Role
- Media release
Notes on this record
- Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.
- An opinion that misconduct has occurred is not, and is not to be taken as, a finding or opinion that a person has committed a criminal or disciplinary offence (Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003, s 217A; s 23 in reports made under the Act as first enacted).
Coverage
This publisher
- The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
- Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
- The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
- Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
- No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.