Historical Government housing deal reveals big losses – and many serious misconduct risks
- Findings, opinions and statements
- 1
- Report length
- 47 pages
Summary
The report's own summary: INTRODUCTION, pages 5 to 8
Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.
The Corruption and Crime Commission investigated the involvement of the Housing Authority in the Stella Orion housing development.
Serious misconduct risks in a Housing Authority project, page 5 · Serious misconduct risks in a Housing Authority project, page 6
The Commission estimated a loss of $29,049,936 to the Department of Communities, which questioned the amount without providing an alternative.
Serious misconduct risks in a Housing Authority project, page 5
The Commission formed no opinion of serious misconduct and was satisfied that those involved acted in good faith rather than corruptly.
Serious misconduct risks in a Housing Authority project, page 6
The Commission identified risks involving inadequate due diligence, inaccessible records and insufficient supervision of a consultant making financial decisions.
Serious misconduct risks in a Housing Authority project, page 7
Findings, opinions and statements 1
Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.
no opinion of serious misconduct
No findingAfter extensive investigation the Commission has formed no opinion of serious misconduct.
Serious misconduct risks in a Housing Authority project, page 6
Recommendations
No recommendations are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.
Published responses
No published response was found.
Official documents 2
Serious misconduct risks in a Housing Authority project
Document details
- Role
- Report
Media Release - Historical Government housing deal reveals big losses – and many serious misconduct risks
Document details
- Status
- Linked
- Role
- Media release
Notes on this record
- Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.
- Date is the date the Commission's report page was published; the report states no date OPAX read.
Coverage
This publisher
- The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
- Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
- The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
- Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
- No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.