A report into WA Police Force's identification and management of at risk officers
- Recommendations
- 2
- Published responses
- 1
- Report length
- 22 pages
Summary
The report's own summary: Overview, pages 4 to 6
Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.
The Corruption and Crime Commission reviewed two WA Police investigations into allegations of excessive force by an officer.
The Commission considered both investigations inadequate and their conclusions unsupported by adequate inquiries.
The Commission made two recommendations about early support for officers at risk of misconduct and broader reporting of force to the head or neck.
WA Police rejected both recommendations, but the Commission retained them.
In the body's own words
- Opinion
In the Commission's opinion, both investigations were inadequate and therefore the findings were not reasonably open.
Findings, opinions and statements
Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.
No findings are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.
Recommendations 2
Recommendation 1
Review the early intervention system to identify at risk officers and give support while offering other options such as retraining or reallocation of duties.
Recommendation 2
Consider expanding the requirement to report use of force when empty hand tactics are used to the head or neck.
Published responses 1
Official documents 2
A report into WA Police Force's identification and management of at risk officers
Document details
- Role
- Report
MEDIA RELEASE - A report into WA Police Force's identification and management of at risk officers
Document details
- Status
- Linked
- Role
- Media release
Notes on this record
- Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.
- Date is the date the Commission's report page was published; the report states no date OPAX read.
Coverage
This publisher
- The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
- Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
- The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
- Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
- No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.