Skip to content

OPAX is on iPhone and iPad. Get the app

Menu

A report into WA Police Force's identification and management of at risk officers

Report · Corruption and Crime Commission (WA CCC) · Western Australia · Published

Recommendations
2
Published responses
1
Report length
22 pages

Summary

The report's own summary: Overview, pages 4 to 6

Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.

  • The Corruption and Crime Commission reviewed two WA Police investigations into allegations of excessive force by an officer.

    Report, page 5

  • The Commission considered both investigations inadequate and their conclusions unsupported by adequate inquiries.

    Report, page 5

  • The Commission made two recommendations about early support for officers at risk of misconduct and broader reporting of force to the head or neck.

    Report, page 6

  • WA Police rejected both recommendations, but the Commission retained them.

    Report, page 20 · Report, page 22

In the body's own words

  1. Opinion

    In the Commission's opinion, both investigations were inadequate and therefore the findings were not reasonably open.

    Report, page 5

Findings, opinions and statements

Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.

No findings are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.

Recommendations 2

  1. Recommendation 1

    Review the early intervention system to identify at risk officers and give support while offering other options such as retraining or reallocation of duties.

    Report, page 20

  2. Recommendation 2

    Consider expanding the requirement to report use of force when empty hand tactics are used to the head or neck.

    Report, page 20

Published responses 1

Official documents 2

Notes on this record

  • Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.
  • Date is the date the Commission's report page was published; the report states no date OPAX read.

Coverage

This publisher

  • The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
  • Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
  • The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
  • Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
  • No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.