Skip to content

OPAX is on iPhone and iPad. Get the app

Menu

Report on electorate allowances and management of electorate offices

Report · Corruption and Crime Commission (WA CCC) · Western Australia · Published

Findings, opinions and statements
6
Report length
89 pages

Summary

The report's own summary: Introduction, pages 5 to 7

Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.

  • The Corruption and Crime Commission reported on its continuing investigation into parliamentary allowances and the management of electorate offices.

    Report, page 5

  • It examined private use of allowances, recruitment of electorate staff and interference with the investigation.

    Report, page 5 · Report, page 6

  • The Commission formed serious misconduct opinions about two former members’ use of allowances and one former member’s employment of electorate staff.

    Report, page 86

  • The Commission identified insufficient oversight of both allowance spending and electorate staff employment.

    Report, page 85

  • The Commission made two recommendations to implement a staff code of conduct and adapt public service recruitment requirements for electorate staff.

    Report, page 88 · Report, page 89

Findings, opinions and statements 6

Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.

  1. opinion of serious misconduct

    Opinion

    The Commission has formed opinions of serious misconduct in respect of the former members, Mr Brian Ellis and Mr Nigel Hallett as identified in this Report.

    Report, page 86

  2. opinion of serious misconduct

    Opinion

    In respect of Mr Ellis' conduct as a public officer relating to his parliamentary allowances, the Commission has formed an opinion of serious misconduct.

    Report, page 86

  3. opinion of serious misconduct

    Opinion

    In respect of Mr Hallett's conduct as a public officer relating to his parliamentary allowances, the Commission has formed an opinion of serious misconduct.

    Report, page 86

  4. opinion of serious misconduct

    Opinion

    In respect of Mr Hallett's conduct as a public officer relating to the employment of Ms Cornwall, the Commission has formed an opinion of serious misconduct.

    Report, page 86

  5. no opinion of serious misconduct

    No finding

    The Commission has not formed an opinion of serious misconduct against Ms Cornwall.

    Report, page 86

  6. no opinion of serious misconduct

    No finding

    In respect of the Hon Ricky Mazza MLC's conduct as a public officer relating to his use of his electorate allowance during his 2016 wine tour with Mr Hallett and Mr Edman, the Commission does not form an opinion of serious misconduct.

    Report, page 87

Recommendations

No recommendations are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.

Published responses

No published response was found.

Notes on this record

  • Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.
  • Date is the date the Commission's report page was published; the report states no date OPAX read.
  • An opinion that misconduct has occurred is not, and is not to be taken as, a finding or opinion that a person has committed a criminal or disciplinary offence (Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003, s 217A; s 23 in reports made under the Act as first enacted).

Coverage

This publisher

  • The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
  • Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
  • The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
  • Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
  • No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.