Skip to content

OPAX is on iPhone and iPad. Get the app

Menu

Further review of the WA Police Force response to an incident in the lock-up of a country town

Report · Corruption and Crime Commission (WA CCC) · Western Australia · Published

Recommendations
4
Report length
20 pages

Summary

The report's own summary: INTRODUCTION, pages 4 to 5

Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.

  • The Corruption and Crime Commission reviewed the response by WA Police to four earlier recommendations and a later force incident involving the same officer.

    Report, page 4

  • The recommendations concerned training, custody records and management, supervision of inexperienced officers and use of force reporting.

    Report, page 4 · Report, page 6 · Report, page 10 · Report, page 12 · Report, page 14

  • The Commission concluded that WA Police had adequately addressed the first three recommendations.

    Report, page 20

  • The Commission kept the reporting recommendation open because policy changes were incomplete and planned to follow up after one year.

    Report, page 15 · Report, page 20

In the body's own words

  1. Conclusion

    The Commission considers that the WA Police Force has taken appropriate steps to address recommendations one, two and three.

    Report, page 20

  2. Conclusion

    In response to recommendation four, the Commission considers it incomplete and intends to follow up on this recommendation in one year's time.

    Report, page 20

Findings, opinions and statements

Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.

No findings are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.

Recommendations 4

  1. Recommendation ONE

    The Commission recommends that consideration be given to 'bespoke training' being provided to individuals who demonstrate a pattern of behaviour in excessive use of force, along with close monitoring and management.

    Report, page 6

  2. Recommendation TWO

    The WA Police Force should consider whether the deficiencies in custody records and management, including use of force reporting and after care, are isolated to this incident or reflect a more general lack of understanding within the Force.

    Report, page 10

  3. Recommendation THREE

    Consideration should be given to ensuring that custody officers have sufficient training and experience to carry out their duties. In particular, consideration should be given as to whether probationary constables should carry out the duties of a custody officer without direction from a more experienced officer.

    Report, page 12

  4. Recommendation FOUR

    In scenarios where officers do not identify 'bodily injury', but the subject is clearly in severe discomfort following a use of force incident, it is recommended that such a scenario is reflected within the purpose and intent of the policy to record the incident in a use of force report.

    Report, page 14

Published responses

No published response was found.

Official documents 2

Notes on this record

  • Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.
  • Date is the date the Commission's report page was published; the report states no date OPAX read.

Coverage

This publisher

  • The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
  • Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
  • The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
  • Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
  • No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.