Skip to content

OPAX is on iPhone and iPad. Get the app

Menu

Report into how conflicts of interest undermine good governance - A report on the Chief Executive Officer of the Shire of Halls Creek

Report · Corruption and Crime Commission (WA CCC) · Western Australia · Dated

Findings, opinions and statements
4
Report length
40 pages

Summary

The report's own summary: INTRODUCTION, page 5

Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.

  • The Corruption and Crime Commission investigated possible serious misconduct by public officers at the Shire of Halls Creek.

    Report, page 6

  • Its inquiries covered recruitment, outside business interests, leave entitlements and vehicle procurement.

    Report, page 5 · Report, page 6

  • The Commission formed a serious misconduct opinion about the chief executive officer's appointment of his partner.

    Report, page 17

  • It concluded that insufficient oversight had allowed the chief executive officer to use Shire resources for private benefit.

    Report, page 40

  • The Commission stressed fair tender processes and procurement knowledge among staff responsible for Shire finances.

    Report, page 40

Findings, opinions and statements 4

Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.

  1. opinion of serious misconduct

    Opinion

    The Commission has formed opinions of serious misconduct in respect of Mr Kerr-Newell.

    Report, page 7

  2. no opinion of serious misconduct

    No finding

    The Commission has identified a lackadaisical and flawed procurement process for the purchase of Shire vehicles but has formed no opinion of serious misconduct.

    Report, page 7

  3. opinion of serious misconduct

    Opinion

    The Commission has formed an opinion of serious misconduct in respect of Mr Kerr-Newell's appointment of Ms Little.

    Report, page 17

  4. opinion of serious misconduct

    Opinion

    The Commission has formed an opinion of serious misconduct in respect of Mr Kerr-Newell's failure to lodge annual returns in the prescribed form for the 2015/2016 and 2016/2017 financial years.

    Report, page 22

Recommendations

No recommendations are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.

Published responses

No published response was found.

Official documents 2

Notes on this record

  • Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.
  • An opinion that misconduct has occurred is not, and is not to be taken as, a finding or opinion that a person has committed a criminal or disciplinary offence (Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003, s 217A; s 23 in reports made under the Act as first enacted).

Coverage

This publisher

  • The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
  • Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
  • The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
  • Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
  • No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.