Skip to content

OPAX is on iPhone and iPad. Get the app

Menu

Report on corrupt custodial officers and the risks of contraband entering prisons

Report · Corruption and Crime Commission (WA CCC) · Western Australia · Dated

Opinions
2
Recommendations
1
Report length
32 pages

Summary

Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.

  • The Corruption and Crime Commission investigated conduct by former Acacia prison custodial officers as part of a joint investigation with the Department of Justice.

    Report, page 4

  • The investigation examined drug supply, bribery and the risks of prisoners and organised crime groups corrupting staff.

    Report, page 4

  • The Commission formed serious misconduct opinions against two former custodial officers over drug activities and corruption.

    Report, page 29 · Report, page 30

  • Its five recommendations addressed prison entry screening, steroid education, drug testing, staff vulnerabilities and the analysis of security reports.

    Report, page 31

  • The Commission planned to report on implementation after a year.

    Report, page 31

Opinions 2

Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.

  1. opinion of serious misconduct

    Opinion

    The Commission forms an opinion of serious misconduct against former custodial officer, Mr Jason Hughes pursuant to the Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003 (CCM Act) ss 4(b) and (c).

    Report, page 29

  2. opinion of serious misconduct

    Opinion

    The Commission forms an opinion of serious misconduct against former custodial officer, Mr William Hutton, pursuant to the CCM Act ss 4(a), (b) and (c).

    Report, page 30

Recommendations 1

  1. Recommendation

    The Commission recommends that: a) The current search and screening procedures used on entry to prisons be reviewed to assess compliance and measure effectiveness of those systems, policies and procedures in preventing the entry of drugs into the prison environment. b) Officers receive better education and training about the illegality of steroids and their deleterious effects on the body. c) DoJ's drug testing regime be reviewed and its effectiveness in deterring drug use in prisons and amongst prison staff be measured. d) Periodic professional review of frontline prison staff be provided to identify vulnerabilities with a view to providing support and managing risk. e) Processes for identifying common themes within security reports about a particular officer be reviewed to: i. identify potential at risk behaviors; ii. allow for early intervention; and iii. deter corrupt or improper activity.

    Report, page 31

Published responses

No published response was found.

Official documents 2

Notes on this record

  • Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.
  • An opinion that misconduct has occurred is not, and is not to be taken as, a finding or opinion that a person has committed a criminal or disciplinary offence (Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003, s 217A; s 23 in reports made under the Act as first enacted).

Coverage

This publisher

  • The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
  • Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
  • The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
  • Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
  • No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.