Skip to content

OPAX is on iPhone and iPad. Get the app

Menu

Report into inadequate use of force reporting at Hakea Prison on 21 March 2016

Report · Corruption and Crime Commission (WA CCC) · Western Australia · Dated

Recommendations
1
Published responses
1
Report length
28 pages

Summary

The report's own summary: INTRODUCTION, pages 4 to 6

Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.

  • The Corruption and Crime Commission investigated reporting after an officer used force during a prisoner’s induction at Hakea Prison.

    Report, page 4

  • It compared CCTV recordings with officers’ reports and examined officers privately.

    Report, page 4 · Report, page 5 · Report, page 6

  • The Commission found that reports obscured and minimised the force used, but was not persuaded that the officer’s wrongful reporting was necessarily corrupt.

    Report, page 6 · Report, page 22

  • Its five recommendations cover specialised training, accurate reporting, action on reporting failures, safeguards against collusion and confidential reporting channels.

    Report, page 27

In the body's own words

  1. Finding

    The officers' descriptions of the force used by PO Mattar were vague and served to obscure and minimise what occurred.

    Report, page 6

  2. Conclusion

    This practice was not conducive to ensuring IDRs were prepared independently.

    Report, page 23

Findings, opinions and statements

Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.

No findings are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.

Recommendations 1

  1. Recommendation

    The Commission recommends DoJ: Consider whether specialised training is needed for officers assigned to specialised units. Conduct mandatory training for prison officers in relation to independent, accurate and factual reporting of use of force incidents that includes: i) the use which can be made of a prison officer's reports in legal, administrative, disciplinary and prison offence proceedings; ii) the consequences of colluding, making false or inaccurate statements or omitting material matters; and iii) the interrelation between reporting on use of force incidents and an officer's duties and oath under the Prisons Act. Continue to take action against prison officers who make inaccurate statements or material omissions from IDRs, or who do not submit an IDR when required to do so and maintain a register of the action taken. Update, monitor and audit systems (including TOMS), processes and physical spaces to reduce the opportunity for prison officers to collude about their IDRs or otherwise view or copy the IDRs of others. Support and regularly promote awareness of confidential mechanisms for staff to report potential criminal activity and misconduct concerning prison officers using force against prisoners.

    Report, page 27

Published responses 1

Official documents 2

Notes on this record

  • Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.

Coverage

This publisher

  • The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
  • Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
  • The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
  • Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
  • No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.